[PATCH v9 09/15] drm/bridge: analogix_dp: Apply drm_bridge_connector helper

[Damon Ding]

Hi Luca,

On 3/3/2026 5:42 PM, Luca Ceresoli wrote:
> Hello Damon,
> 
> On Tue Feb 10, 2026 at 8:12 AM CET, Damon Ding wrote:
>> Apply drm_bridge_connector helper for Analogix DP driver.
>>
>> The following changes have been made:
>> - Apply drm_bridge_connector helper to get rid of &drm_connector_funcs
>>    and &drm_connector_helper_funcs.
>> - Remove unnecessary parameter struct drm_connector* for callback
>>    &analogix_dp_plat_data.attach.
>> - Remove &analogix_dp_device.connector.
>> - Convert analogix_dp_atomic_check()/analogix_dp_detect() to
>>    &drm_bridge_funcs.atomic_check()/&drm_bridge_funcs.detect().
>> - Split analogix_dp_get_modes() into &drm_bridge_funcs.get_modes() and
>>    &drm_bridge_funcs.edid_read().
>> - Set flag DRM_BRIDGE_ATTACH_NO_CONNECTOR for bridge attachment while
>>    binding. Meanwhile, make DRM_BRIDGE_ATTACH_NO_CONNECTOR unsuppported
>                               ^
> 
> Do you mean "!DRM_BRIDGE_ATTACH_NO_CONNECTOR" here (i.e. missing '!')?
> 
> Also, unsuppported -> unsupported (typo)
> 

Will fix in v10.

>>    in analogix_dp_bridge_attach().
>> - Set &drm_bridge.ops according to different cases.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Damon Ding <damon.ding at rock-chips.com>
>> Tested-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski at samsung.com>
>> Tested-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko at sntech.de> (on rk3588)
> 
> I had a quick look, looks good overall, for the moment I have only a
> question, see below.
> 
> I aim at reviewing this patch in depth, but it's not an easy one to
> digest. Would it be feasible to split it in smaller logical steps? If it
> is, please do, it would be very helpful for reviewing.

Yes, this commit will be split into several smaller ones in v10.

> 
>> @@ -1532,6 +1481,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(analogix_dp_resume);
>>
>>   int analogix_dp_bind(struct analogix_dp_device *dp, struct drm_device *drm_dev)
>>   {
>> +	struct drm_bridge *bridge = &dp->bridge;
>>   	int ret;
>>
>>   	dp->drm_dev = drm_dev;
>> @@ -1545,7 +1495,18 @@ int analogix_dp_bind(struct analogix_dp_device *dp, struct drm_device *drm_dev)
>>   		return ret;
>>   	}
>>
>> -	ret = drm_bridge_attach(dp->encoder, &dp->bridge, NULL, 0);
>> +	if (dp->plat_data->panel)
>> +		bridge->ops = DRM_BRIDGE_OP_MODES | DRM_BRIDGE_OP_DETECT;
>> +	else
>> +		bridge->ops = DRM_BRIDGE_OP_EDID | DRM_BRIDGE_OP_DETECT;
>> +
>> +	bridge->of_node = dp->dev->of_node;
>> +	bridge->type = DRM_MODE_CONNECTOR_eDP;
>> +	ret = devm_drm_bridge_add(dp->dev, &dp->bridge);
> 
> Can devm_drm_bridge_add() be added to analogix_dp_probe() instead?

Will do in v10.

> 
>> +	if (ret)
>> +		goto err_unregister_aux;
>> +
>> +	ret = drm_bridge_attach(dp->encoder, bridge, NULL, DRM_BRIDGE_ATTACH_NO_CONNECTOR);
>>   	if (ret) {
>>   		DRM_ERROR("failed to create bridge (%d)\n", ret);
>>   		goto err_unregister_aux;

Best regards,
Damon