[PATCH v7 0/2] arm64: dts: rockchip: add Vicharak Axon board support

[Hrushiraj Gandhi]

On Tue, Jul 07, 2026 at 08:23:47PM +0200, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 7. Juli 2026, 18:03:54 Mitteleuropäische Sommerzeit schrieb Rob Herring:
> > On Thu, Jul 02, 2026 at 09:04:55PM +0200, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
> > > 
> > > On Mon, 08 Jun 2026 11:39:38 +0530, Hrushiraj Gandhi wrote:
> > > > This series adds initial device tree support for the Vicharak Axon
> > > > single-board computer, which is based on the Rockchip RK3588 SoC.
> > > > 
> > > > The Vicharak Axon is a feature-rich SBC targeting developer and embedded
> > > > use cases. It ships with:
> > > > 
> > > >   - Rockchip RK3588 (4x Cortex-A76 + 4x Cortex-A55)
> > > >   - RK806 PMIC providing all SoC power domains
> > > >   - eMMC 5.1 (on-board) and microSD slot
> > > >   - Gigabit Ethernet via RGMII (RTL8211F)
> > > >   - Dual HDMI 2.1 output and one HDMI 2.0 input (receiver)
> > > >   - PCIe 3.0 x4 and two PCIe 2.0 slots
> > > >   - SATA 3.0
> > > >   - USB 2.0 host ports (EHCI/OHCI)
> > > >   - NXP PCA9554 I/O expander for status LEDs
> > > >   - Haoyu HYM8563 RTC
> > > > 
> > > > [...]
> > > 
> > > Applied, thanks!
> > > 
> > > [1/2] dt-bindings: arm: rockchip: add Vicharak Axon board
> > >       commit: e0008b108aaf8c5aa22930b2ceadf8f894562acb
> > > [2/2] arm64: dts: rockchip: add Vicharak Axon board
> > >       commit: e08c3389c78dbefd31a57df8807cf57ef6f3c9b1
> > 
> > Both have issues and should be dropped.
> 
> I've dropped both the Axon as well as the Vaaman2 board from the
> same vendor now.
> 
> The whole thing is confusing.
> 
> I should've caught the pinctrl issue, and do remember running a dtbscheck
> on at least one Vcharak board - but that must have been the Vaaman2 board
> because there the pmic fullfills the binding (and general setup of other
> rk3588 boards).
> 
> The vendor-prefix is missing indeed. I found earlier versions of the
> version-avalanche had it, up until v6 [0] . Though I haven't figured out
> yet why it was lost.

Regarding the missing vendor prefix 'vicharak' that was noted: the prefix 
was already submitted separately upstream by my team in a different patch [1]. 
Because it was already submitted, Krzysztof asked us to drop it from our 
own series to avoid duplicates [2]. 

[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2026/6/24/929
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-rockchip/96c9b1eb-9f8e-430d-9c38-eb4d489d7d24@kernel.org/

> 
> Hence I dropped both boards.
> 
> 
> Hrushiraj: please start anew with both boards.
> 
> But include all the tags you received in previous versions.
> 
> 
> Heiko
> 
> 
> [0] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-rockchip/20260601162143.170030-2-hrushirajg23@gmail.com/
> 
> 

Hrushiraj