[PATCH v2 1/3] media: dt-bindings: rockchip,vdec: Correct reg-names order for RK35{76,88}

[Cristian Ciocaltea]

On 2/24/26 3:54 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 24/02/2026 14:48, Nicolas Dufresne wrote:
>> Le mardi 24 février 2026 à 14:18 +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski a écrit :
>>> On 24/02/2026 14:14, Nicolas Dufresne wrote:
>>>>>>  
>>>>>>    reg-names:
>>>>>> -    items:
>>>>>> +    oneOf:
>>>>>>        - const: function
>>>>>> -      - const: link
>>>>>> -      - const: cache
>>>>>> +      - items:
>>>>>> +          - const: link
>>>>>> +          - const: function
>>>>>> +          - const: cache
>>>>>
>>>>> No, ABI break without point.
>>>>
>>>> Its not released yet, otherwise both order would need to be allowed.
>>>>
>>> Also, not true.
>>>
>>> git describe --contains  c6ffb7e1fb90
>>> v6.17-rc1~90^2~3
>>
>> Ack, I thought this was part of 7.0, it would have been logical to be part of
>> 7.0-rc1 I must say. Whatever happen, backward compat will unfortunatly be
>> needed.
> 
> 
> I was here checking the binding, so the ABI. DTS maybe was in v7.0-rc1
> indeed. Anyway, the commit msg should describe the impact on users of
> this ABI, at least known users.

My bad, I only checked the DTS changes which landed in v7.0-rc1, and wrongly
assumed the binding also landed about the same time.  I think it's unlikely
there are any (external) users of this binding, but obviously we cannot be 100%
sure.

Would it be acceptable to extend the binding so that it allows both the current
and the new proposed order to coexist?

Thanks,
Cristian