[PATCH v2 3/3] scsi: ufs: rockchip: init support for UFS

[Shawn Lin]

在 2024/8/8 18:36, Krzysztof Kozlowski 写道:
> On 08/08/2024 05:52, Shawn Lin wrote:
>> RK3576 contains a UFS controller, add init support fot it.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin at rock-chips.com>
>>
> 
> ...
> 
>> +	err = clk_prepare_enable(host->ref_out_clk);
>> +	if (err)
>> +		return dev_err_probe(dev, err, "failed to enable ref out clock\n");
>> +
>> +	host->rst_gpio = devm_gpiod_get(&pdev->dev, "reset", GPIOD_OUT_LOW);
>> +	if (IS_ERR(host->rst_gpio)) {
>> +		dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, PTR_ERR(host->rst_gpio),
>> +				"invalid reset-gpios property in node\n");
>> +		err = PTR_ERR(host->rst_gpio);
> 
> No. Look at your code above - you have return dev_err_probe, so logical
> is that the syntax is err = dev_err_probe. Don't over-complicate the code.
> 
> Anyway, this is suspicious. You already have resets with four resets
> (!!!) and you claim you have fifth reset - GPIO? This looks just wrong,
> like you represent some properties which do not belong here.
> 

Thanks for the feadback.

Yes, we have 4 resets for controller, and one gpio to reset the
device. It happened to be called reset-gpios in DT but can be
any name if you like it to be. I added reset-gpios as a required one
listed in dt-bindings file, in patch 2.


 > Also, why do you leave the device in the reset state? Logical one
means
 > - reset is asserted. This applies to ufs_rockchip_device_reset() as > 
well
 > - that's just wrong code.


No, I tested it in linux-net and the output is HIGH, and leave the
device in active state.

In dts, we add:
reset-gpios = <&gpio4 RK_PD0 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;

so gpiod_set_value_cansleep(host->rst_gpio, 1) -> output HIGH for
gpio4_d0. Based on your comment, we should change the dts to use
GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW and then gpiod_set_value_cansleep（host->rst_gpio, 0）


Both can work, however IMO, isn't logical one means HIGH level in line 
more human readable?



> Where is your DTS so we can validate it?
> 

Will add it in the next version, as now the rk3576.dtsi is under
reviewed and UFS node was not added. So I was afraid to interfere
with that patch and just wanted to add incremental patch once
rk3576.dtsi got merged.

> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>