[PATCH v2 2/3] clk: rockchip: Add dt-binding header for rk3576

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 06/08/2024 17:23, Detlev Casanova wrote:
> On Sunday, 4 August 2024 05:53:57 EDT Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 02/08/2024 23:35, Detlev Casanova wrote:
>>> From: Elaine Zhang <zhangqing at rock-chips.com>
>>>
>>> Add the dt-bindings header for the rk3576, that gets shared between
>>> the clock controller and the clock references in the dts.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Elaine Zhang <zhangqing at rock-chips.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Sugar Zhang <sugar.zhang at rock-chips.com>
>>> [rebased, separate clocks and resets]
>>> Signed-off-by: Detlev Casanova <detlev.casanova at collabora.com>
>>
>> Please use subject prefixes matching the subsystem. You can get them for
>> example with `git log --oneline -- DIRECTORY_OR_FILE` on the directory
>> your patch is touching. For bindings, the preferred subjects are
>> explained here:
>> https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/devicetree/bindings/submitting-patche
>> s.html#i-for-patch-submitters
>>> ---
>>>
>>>  .../dt-bindings/clock/rockchip,rk3576-cru.h   | 589 ++++++++++++++++++
>>>  .../dt-bindings/reset/rockchip,rk3576-cru.h   | 484 ++++++++++++++
>>>  2 files changed, 1073 insertions(+)
>>>  create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/clock/rockchip,rk3576-cru.h
>>>  create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/reset/rockchip,rk3576-cru.h
>>
>> These are bindings. Must be squashed with previous patch.
> 
> Ok, so you'd rather have a commit for reset definitions (dt-bindings: reset: 
> Add rk3576 reset definitions) and another one for clock definitions + 
> Documentation (dt-bindings: clock: Add rk3576 clock definitions and 
> documentation) ?
> 
>>> diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/clock/rockchip,rk3576-cru.h
>>> b/include/dt-bindings/clock/rockchip,rk3576-cru.h new file mode 100644
>>> index 0000000000000..14b54543d1a11
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/include/dt-bindings/clock/rockchip,rk3576-cru.h
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,589 @@
>>> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0+ OR MIT) */
>>
>> Weird license. Why not using recommended one?
> 
> Oh right, I suppose "GPL-2.0 OR MIT" is better ? At least that is what I see 
> for rk3588. include/dt-bindings/clock/rockchip,rv1126-cru.h uses "GPL-2.0+ OR 
> MIT" though.
> 
>>> +/*
>>> + * Copyright (c) 2023 Rockchip Electronics Co. Ltd.
>>> + * Author: Elaine Zhang <zhangqing at rock-chips.com>
>>> + */
>>> +
>>> +#ifndef _DT_BINDINGS_CLK_ROCKCHIP_RK3576_H
>>> +#define _DT_BINDINGS_CLK_ROCKCHIP_RK3576_H
>>> +
>>> +/* cru-clocks indices */
>>> +
>>> +/* cru plls */
>>> +#define PLL_BPLL			1
>>> +#define PLL_LPLL			3
>>> +#define PLL_VPLL			4
>>> +#define PLL_AUPLL			5
>>> +#define PLL_CPLL			6
>>> +#define PLL_GPLL			7
>>> +#define PLL_PPLL			9
>>
>> Nope, indices start from 1 and are incremented continuously.
> 
> Why start at 1 ? RK3588 starts at 0 for clocks and resets

Or 0, even better, sure.

Best regards,
Krzysztof