[PATCH] spi: Replace `dummy.nbytes` with `dummy.ncycles`
Serge Semin
fancer.lancer at gmail.com
Mon Sep 26 10:24:54 PDT 2022
@Mark, @Tudor, @Pratyush, @Michael could you please join the
discussion regarding the dummy.buswidth and dummy.dtr fields in the
spi_mem_op structure?
On Mon, Sep 26, 2022 at 09:05:49AM +0000, Sergiu.Moga at microchip.com wrote:
> On 26.09.2022 01:03, Serge Semin wrote:
> > Hello Sergiu
> >
Sergiu, you didn't address all my comments. Please be more attentive.
>
>
> Hello Serge,
>
>
> > On Sun, Sep 11, 2022 at 08:45:53PM +0300, Sergiu Moga wrote:
> >> In order to properly represent the hardware functionality
> >> in the core, avoid reconverting the number of dummy cycles
> >> to the number of bytes and only work with the former.
> >> Instead, let the drivers that do need this conversion do
> >> it themselves.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Sergiu Moga <sergiu.moga at microchip.com>
> >> ---
> >> drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.c | 22 ++++----------
> >
> > [...]
> >
> >> drivers/spi/spi-dw-core.c | 10 +++++--
> >
> > [...]
> >
> >> drivers/spi/spi-mem.c | 27 +++++++++++------
> >
> > [...]
> >
> >> drivers/spi/spi-mtk-nor.c | 48 +++++++++++++++++--------------
> >
> > [...]
> >
> >> drivers/spi/spi-zynq-qspi.c | 15 ++++++----
> >> drivers/spi/spi-zynqmp-gqspi.c | 8 ++++--
> >> include/linux/spi/spi-mem.h | 10 +++----
> >> 25 files changed, 234 insertions(+), 147 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.c b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.c
> >> index f2c64006f8d7..cc8ca824f912 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.c
> >> @@ -88,7 +88,7 @@ void spi_nor_spimem_setup_op(const struct spi_nor *nor,
> >> if (op->addr.nbytes)
> >> op->addr.buswidth = spi_nor_get_protocol_addr_nbits(proto);
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >> - if (op->dummy.nbytes)
> >> + if (op->dummy.ncycles)
> >> op->dummy.buswidth = spi_nor_get_protocol_addr_nbits(proto);
> >>
> >> if (op->data.nbytes)
> >> @@ -106,9 +106,6 @@ void spi_nor_spimem_setup_op(const struct spi_nor *nor,
> >> op->dummy.dtr = true;
> >> op->data.dtr = true;
> >>
> >> - /* 2 bytes per clock cycle in DTR mode. */
> >> - op->dummy.nbytes *= 2;
> >> -
> >> ext = spi_nor_get_cmd_ext(nor, op);
> >> op->cmd.opcode = (op->cmd.opcode << 8) | ext;
> >> op->cmd.nbytes = 2;
> >> @@ -207,10 +204,7 @@ static ssize_t spi_nor_spimem_read_data(struct spi_nor *nor, loff_t from,
> >>
> >> spi_nor_spimem_setup_op(nor, &op, nor->read_proto);
> >>
> >> - /* convert the dummy cycles to the number of bytes */
> >> - op.dummy.nbytes = (nor->read_dummy * op.dummy.buswidth) / 8;
> >> - if (spi_nor_protocol_is_dtr(nor->read_proto))
> >> - op.dummy.nbytes *= 2;
> >> + op.dummy.ncycles = nor->read_dummy;
> >
> > So according to this modification and what is done in the rest of the
> > patch, the dummy part of the SPI-mem operations now contains the number
> > of cycles only. Am I right to think that it means a number of dummy
> > clock oscillations? (Judging from what I've seen in the HW-manuals of
> > the SPI NOR memory devices most likely I am...)
>
>
>
> Yes, you are correct.
>
>
> > If so the "ncycles" field
> > is now free from the "data" semantic. Then what is the meaning of the
> > "buswidth and "dtr" fields in the spi_mem_op.dummy field?
> >
>
>
> It is still meaningful as it is used for the conversion by some drivers
> to nbytes and I do not see how it goes out of the specification in any
> way. So, at least for now, I do not see any reason to remove these fields.
I do see the way these fields are used in the SPI-mem drivers. I was
wondering what do these bits mean in the framework of the SPI-mem
core? AFAICS from the specification the dummy cycles are irrelevant to
the data bus state. It says "the master tri-states the bus during
'dummy' cycles." If so I don't see a reason to have the DTR and
buswidth fields in the spi_mem_op structure anymore. The number of
cycles could be calculated right on the initialization stage based on
the SPI NOR/NAND requirements.
@Mark, @Tudor, @Pratyush, what do you think?
>
>
> >>
> >> usebouncebuf = spi_nor_spimem_bounce(nor, &op);
> >>
> >> @@ -455,7 +449,7 @@ int spi_nor_read_sr(struct spi_nor *nor, u8 *sr)
> >>
> >> if (nor->reg_proto == SNOR_PROTO_8_8_8_DTR) {
> >> op.addr.nbytes = nor->params->rdsr_addr_nbytes;
> >> - op.dummy.nbytes = nor->params->rdsr_dummy;
> >> + op.dummy.ncycles = nor->params->rdsr_dummy;
> >> /*
> >> * We don't want to read only one byte in DTR mode. So,
> >> * read 2 and then discard the second byte.
> >> @@ -1913,10 +1907,7 @@ static int spi_nor_spimem_check_readop(struct spi_nor *nor,
> >>
> >> spi_nor_spimem_setup_op(nor, &op, read->proto);
> >>
> >> - /* convert the dummy cycles to the number of bytes */
> >> - op.dummy.nbytes = (nor->read_dummy * op.dummy.buswidth) / 8;
> >> - if (spi_nor_protocol_is_dtr(nor->read_proto))
> >> - op.dummy.nbytes *= 2;
> >> + op.dummy.ncycles = nor->read_dummy;
> >>
> >> return spi_nor_spimem_check_op(nor, &op);
> >> }
> >> @@ -3034,10 +3025,7 @@ static int spi_nor_create_read_dirmap(struct spi_nor *nor)
> >>
> >> spi_nor_spimem_setup_op(nor, op, nor->read_proto);
> >>
> >> - /* convert the dummy cycles to the number of bytes */
> >> - op->dummy.nbytes = (nor->read_dummy * op->dummy.buswidth) / 8;
> >> - if (spi_nor_protocol_is_dtr(nor->read_proto))
> >> - op->dummy.nbytes *= 2;
> >> + op->dummy.ncycles = nor->read_dummy;
> >>
> >> /*
> >> * Since spi_nor_spimem_setup_op() only sets buswidth when the number
> >
> > [...]
> >
> >> diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-dw-core.c b/drivers/spi/spi-dw-core.c
> >> index f87d97ccd2d6..0ba5c7d0e66e 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/spi/spi-dw-core.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-dw-core.c
> >> @@ -498,13 +498,17 @@ static bool dw_spi_supports_mem_op(struct spi_mem *mem,
> >> static int dw_spi_init_mem_buf(struct dw_spi *dws, const struct spi_mem_op *op)
> >> {
> >> unsigned int i, j, len;
> >> - u8 *out;
> >> + u8 *out, dummy_nbytes;
> >>
> >> /*
> >> * Calculate the total length of the EEPROM command transfer and
> >> * either use the pre-allocated buffer or create a temporary one.
> >> */
> >> - len = op->cmd.nbytes + op->addr.nbytes + op->dummy.nbytes;
> >
> >> + dummy_nbytes = (op->dummy.ncycles * op->dummy.buswidth) / 8;
> >
> > 1. What about using the BITS_PER_BYTE macro (linux/bits.h) here? Since
> > you are adding a similar modification to so many drivers what about using
> > that macro there too?
> >
>
>
> AFAICT BIT_PER_BYTE is meant to transparently indicate how many bits per
> byte an arch has. Although, there is no place in the kernel from what I
> can see that has BITS_PER_BYTE with a value other than 8, you cannot
> deny that there exist architectures whose number of bits per byte may be
> different from 8.
Judging by the way the macro is declared it isn't platform specific.
So no, the kernel always expects the byte having eight bits.
>
> Meanwhile, the JESD216E specification tells us in the Terms and
> definitions chapter that
> "DWORD: Four consecutive 8-bit bytes used as the basic 32-bit building
> block for headers and parameter tables." So it explicitly says that a
> byte has 8 bits regardless of the arch.
Right. That's what the BITS_PER_BYTE macro is for.
>
> Therefore, I do not agree with replacing 8 with the BITS_PER_BYTE macro
> as, IMO, it does not represent the same thing as the number of bits per
> byte that the terms and definitions of the JESD216E specification refer to.
It represents exactly the same in include/linux/bits.h .
Ideally it would be good to use it in all your updates since you touch
the corresponding parts anyway. But at the very least I would insist on
using the macro in the drivers which already have it utilized like
spi-dw-*, spi-mtk-snfi, spi-mtk-nor.
>
>
> > 2. buswidth is supposed to be always 1 in this driver (see the
> > dw_spi_supports_mem_op() method). So it can be dropped from the
> > statement above.
> >
> > 3. Since the ncycles now contains a number of clock cycles there is no
> > point in taking the SPI bus-width into account at all. What is
> > meaningful is how many oscillations are supposed to be placed on the
> > CLK line before the data is available. So the op->dummy.ncycles /
> > BITS_PER_BYTE statement would be more appropriate here in any case.
> >
>
>
> I can agee with this in the case of this driver, sure.
Ok. thanks.
>
>
> >> + if (op->dummy.dtr)
> >> + dummy_nbytes *= 2;
> >
> > DTR is unsupported by the controller. See, no spi_controller_mem_caps
> > initialized. So this part is redundant. The same is most likely
> > applicable for some of the DTR-related updates in this patch too
> > since the spi_controller_mem_caps structure is initialized in a few
> > drivers only.
> >
>
>
> Agreed. Initially, wherever I was not sure, I just placed this if
> condition to avoid breaking anything in case the driver does support
> DTR. The same goes for your other related observations to other driver
> modifications, with which I agree :).
AFAICS the only drivers which support the DTR-capable transfers are
the ones having the spi_controller_mem_caps structure defined with dtr
set to true or the ones with custom SPI-mem ops. It means that the
DTR-transfers are supported by the spi-mtk-snfi.c, spi-mxic.c,
spi-cadence-quadspi.c and spi-intel.c drivers only. The rest of the
SPI-controller drivers will fail to execute the SPI-mem ops with dtr
flag set due to the spi_mem_default_supports_op() method semantics.
>
>
> >> +
> >> + len = op->cmd.nbytes + op->addr.nbytes + dummy_nbytes;
> >> if (op->data.dir == SPI_MEM_DATA_OUT)
> >> len += op->data.nbytes;
> >>
> >> @@ -525,7 +529,7 @@ static int dw_spi_init_mem_buf(struct dw_spi *dws, const struct spi_mem_op *op)
> >> out[i] = DW_SPI_GET_BYTE(op->cmd.opcode, op->cmd.nbytes - i - 1);
> >> for (j = 0; j < op->addr.nbytes; ++i, ++j)
> >> out[i] = DW_SPI_GET_BYTE(op->addr.val, op->addr.nbytes - j - 1);
> >> - for (j = 0; j < op->dummy.nbytes; ++i, ++j)
> >> + for (j = 0; j < dummy_nbytes; ++i, ++j)
> >> out[i] = 0x0;
> >>
> >> if (op->data.dir == SPI_MEM_DATA_OUT)
> >
> > [...]
> >
> >> diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-mem.c b/drivers/spi/spi-mem.c
> >> index 0c79193d9697..7b204963bb62 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/spi/spi-mem.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-mem.c
> >> @@ -149,7 +149,7 @@ static bool spi_mem_check_buswidth(struct spi_mem *mem,
> >> spi_check_buswidth_req(mem, op->addr.buswidth, true))
> >> return false;
> >>
> >> - if (op->dummy.nbytes &&
> >> + if (op->dummy.ncycles &&
> >> spi_check_buswidth_req(mem, op->dummy.buswidth, true))
> >> return false;
> >>
> >> @@ -202,7 +202,7 @@ static int spi_mem_check_op(const struct spi_mem_op *op)
> >> return -EINVAL;
> >>
> >> if ((op->addr.nbytes && !op->addr.buswidth) ||
> >> - (op->dummy.nbytes && !op->dummy.buswidth) ||
> >> + (op->dummy.ncycles && !op->dummy.buswidth) ||
> >> (op->data.nbytes && !op->data.buswidth))
> >> return -EINVAL;
> >>
> >> @@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ int spi_mem_exec_op(struct spi_mem *mem, const struct spi_mem_op *op)
> >
> >> struct spi_controller *ctlr = mem->spi->controller;
> >> struct spi_transfer xfers[4] = { };
> >> struct spi_message msg;
> >> - u8 *tmpbuf;
> >> + u8 *tmpbuf, dummy_nbytes;
> >> int ret;
> >
> > Reverse xmas tree order?
Please take this note into account. Preserving the locally defined
coding-style convention is a very useful practice. It retains the code
uniformity, which improves readability and maintainability for just no
price.
> >
> >>
> >> ret = spi_mem_check_op(op);
> >> @@ -343,7 +343,11 @@ int spi_mem_exec_op(struct spi_mem *mem, const struct spi_mem_op *op)
> >> return ret;
> >> }
> >>
> >
> >> - tmpbufsize = op->cmd.nbytes + op->addr.nbytes + op->dummy.nbytes;
> >> + dummy_nbytes = (op->dummy.ncycles * op->dummy.buswidth) / 8;
> >
> > So ncycles now indeed is a number of CLK line oscillations. This most
> > likely will break the SPI Nand driver then, which still passes the
> > number of bytes to the SPI_MEM_OP_DUMMY() macro.
> >
> >> + if (op->dummy.dtr)
> >> + dummy_nbytes *= 2;
> >
> > Generic SPI-mem ops don't take the DTR mode into account. So I don't
> > see this necessary.
> >
>
>
> You may be right, but this part of the code does take into consideration
> the number of dummy.nbytes to calculate the xfer length. Therefore,
> shouldn't this code block also know if the number of dummy nbytes is
> actually double the amount that it calculated through the conversion
> formula?
Ok. This part turns to be debatable indeed. On the first glance the
SPI-mem core doesn't anyhow handles the DTR-flag value. On the other
hand SPI-controllers may have the dtr-capability flag set thus, for
instance implicitly supporting the DTR transfers. Finally currently
all the DTR-aware drivers are known to have the custom SPI-mem ops
defined. So some aspects say for dropping the dummy.dtr field usage
from here, some say against it. I'll leave it for you and @Mark,
@Tudor, @Pratyush to decide.
>
>
> >> +
> >> + tmpbufsize = op->cmd.nbytes + op->addr.nbytes + dummy_nbytes;
> >>
> >> /*
> >> * Allocate a buffer to transmit the CMD, ADDR cycles with kmalloc() so
> >> @@ -379,15 +383,15 @@ int spi_mem_exec_op(struct spi_mem *mem, const struct spi_mem_op *op)
> >> totalxferlen += op->addr.nbytes;
> >> }
> >>
> >> - if (op->dummy.nbytes) {
> >> - memset(tmpbuf + op->addr.nbytes + 1, 0xff, op->dummy.nbytes);
> >> + if (dummy_nbytes) {
> >> + memset(tmpbuf + op->addr.nbytes + 1, 0xff, dummy_nbytes);
> >> xfers[xferpos].tx_buf = tmpbuf + op->addr.nbytes + 1;
> >> - xfers[xferpos].len = op->dummy.nbytes;
> >> + xfers[xferpos].len = dummy_nbytes;
> >> xfers[xferpos].tx_nbits = op->dummy.buswidth;
> >> xfers[xferpos].dummy_data = 1;
> >> spi_message_add_tail(&xfers[xferpos], &msg);
> >> xferpos++;
> >> - totalxferlen += op->dummy.nbytes;
> >> + totalxferlen += dummy_nbytes;
> >> }
> >>
> >> if (op->data.nbytes) {
> >> @@ -456,12 +460,17 @@ int spi_mem_adjust_op_size(struct spi_mem *mem, struct spi_mem_op *op)
> >> {
> >
> >> struct spi_controller *ctlr = mem->spi->controller;
> >> size_t len;
> >> + u8 dummy_nbytes;
> >
> > reverse xmas tree?
Please retain the local coding style convention.
> >
> >>
> >> if (ctlr->mem_ops && ctlr->mem_ops->adjust_op_size)
> >> return ctlr->mem_ops->adjust_op_size(mem, op);
> >>
> >> + dummy_nbytes = (op->dummy.ncycles * op->dummy.buswidth) / 8;
> >> + if (op->dummy.dtr)
> >> + dummy_nbytes *= 2;
> >> +
> >> if (!ctlr->mem_ops || !ctlr->mem_ops->exec_op) {
> >> - len = op->cmd.nbytes + op->addr.nbytes + op->dummy.nbytes;
> >> + len = op->cmd.nbytes + op->addr.nbytes + dummy_nbytes;
> >>
> >> if (len > spi_max_transfer_size(mem->spi))
> >> return -EINVAL;
> >
> > [...]
> >
> >> diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-mtk-nor.c b/drivers/spi/spi-mtk-nor.c
> >> index d167699a1a96..f6870c6e911a 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/spi/spi-mtk-nor.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-mtk-nor.c
> >> @@ -171,23 +171,18 @@ static bool need_bounce(struct mtk_nor *sp, const struct spi_mem_op *op)
> >>
> >> static bool mtk_nor_match_read(const struct spi_mem_op *op)
> >> {
> >> - int dummy = 0;
> >> -
> >> - if (op->dummy.nbytes)
> >> - dummy = op->dummy.nbytes * BITS_PER_BYTE / op->dummy.buswidth;
> >> -
> >> if ((op->data.buswidth == 2) || (op->data.buswidth == 4)) {
> >> if (op->addr.buswidth == 1)
> >> - return dummy == 8;
> >> + return op->dummy.ncycles == 8;
> >> else if (op->addr.buswidth == 2)
> >> - return dummy == 4;
> >> + return op->dummy.ncycles == 4;
> >> else if (op->addr.buswidth == 4)
> >> - return dummy == 6;
> >> + return op->dummy.ncycles == 6;
> >> } else if ((op->addr.buswidth == 1) && (op->data.buswidth == 1)) {
> >> if (op->cmd.opcode == 0x03)
> >> - return dummy == 0;
> >> + return op->dummy.ncycles == 0;
> >> else if (op->cmd.opcode == 0x0b)
> >> - return dummy == 8;
> >> + return op->dummy.ncycles == 8;
> >> }
> >> return false;
> >> }
> >> @@ -195,6 +190,10 @@ static bool mtk_nor_match_read(const struct spi_mem_op *op)
> >> static bool mtk_nor_match_prg(const struct spi_mem_op *op)
> >> {
> >> int tx_len, rx_len, prg_len, prg_left;
> >
> >> + u8 dummy_nbytes = (op->dummy.ncycles * op->dummy.buswidth) / 8;
> >> +
> >
> > IMO it's better to move the initialization statement to a separate
> > line here.
Again. The initialization statement is too long. It makes the code
harder to read. Just split the declaration and initialization up.
> >
> >> + if (op->dummy.dtr)
> >> + dummy_nbytes *= 2;
> >
> > Does the MTK SPI driver support DTR? AFAICS it doesn't.
I'll give an answer. It doesn't. The spi_mem_exec_op() will return the
-ENOTSUPP error if an SPI-mem op with any dtr flag set is requested.
> >
> >>
> >> // prg mode is spi-only.
> >> if ((op->cmd.buswidth > 1) || (op->addr.buswidth > 1) ||
> >> @@ -205,7 +204,7 @@ static bool mtk_nor_match_prg(const struct spi_mem_op *op)
> >>
> >> if (op->data.dir == SPI_MEM_DATA_OUT) {
> >> // count dummy bytes only if we need to write data after it
> >> - tx_len += op->dummy.nbytes;
> >> + tx_len += dummy_nbytes;
> >>
> >> // leave at least one byte for data
> >> if (tx_len > MTK_NOR_REG_PRGDATA_MAX)
> >> @@ -221,7 +220,7 @@ static bool mtk_nor_match_prg(const struct spi_mem_op *op)
> >> return false;
> >>
> >> rx_len = op->data.nbytes;
> >> - prg_left = MTK_NOR_PRG_CNT_MAX / 8 - tx_len - op->dummy.nbytes;
> >> + prg_left = MTK_NOR_PRG_CNT_MAX / 8 - tx_len - dummy_nbytes;
> >> if (prg_left > MTK_NOR_REG_SHIFT_MAX + 1)
> >> prg_left = MTK_NOR_REG_SHIFT_MAX + 1;
> >> if (rx_len > prg_left) {
> >> @@ -230,11 +229,11 @@ static bool mtk_nor_match_prg(const struct spi_mem_op *op)
> >> rx_len = prg_left;
> >> }
> >>
> >> - prg_len = tx_len + op->dummy.nbytes + rx_len;
> >> + prg_len = tx_len + dummy_nbytes + rx_len;
> >> if (prg_len > MTK_NOR_PRG_CNT_MAX / 8)
> >> return false;
> >> } else {
> >> - prg_len = tx_len + op->dummy.nbytes;
> >> + prg_len = tx_len + dummy_nbytes;
> >> if (prg_len > MTK_NOR_PRG_CNT_MAX / 8)
> >> return false;
> >> }
> >> @@ -244,15 +243,19 @@ static bool mtk_nor_match_prg(const struct spi_mem_op *op)
> >> static void mtk_nor_adj_prg_size(struct spi_mem_op *op)
> >> {
> >> int tx_len, tx_left, prg_left;
> >
> >> + u8 dummy_nbytes = (op->dummy.ncycles * op->dummy.buswidth) / 8;
> >> +
> >> + if (op->dummy.dtr)
> >> + dummy_nbytes *= 2;
> >
> > ditto
> >
> >>
> >> tx_len = op->cmd.nbytes + op->addr.nbytes;
> >> if (op->data.dir == SPI_MEM_DATA_OUT) {
> >> - tx_len += op->dummy.nbytes;
> >> + tx_len += dummy_nbytes;
> >> tx_left = MTK_NOR_REG_PRGDATA_MAX + 1 - tx_len;
> >> if (op->data.nbytes > tx_left)
> >> op->data.nbytes = tx_left;
> >> } else if (op->data.dir == SPI_MEM_DATA_IN) {
> >> - prg_left = MTK_NOR_PRG_CNT_MAX / 8 - tx_len - op->dummy.nbytes;
> >> + prg_left = MTK_NOR_PRG_CNT_MAX / 8 - tx_len - dummy_nbytes;
> >> if (prg_left > MTK_NOR_REG_SHIFT_MAX + 1)
> >> prg_left = MTK_NOR_REG_SHIFT_MAX + 1;
> >> if (op->data.nbytes > prg_left)
> >> @@ -312,7 +315,7 @@ static bool mtk_nor_supports_op(struct spi_mem *mem,
> >> break;
> >> case SPI_MEM_DATA_OUT:
> >> if ((op->addr.buswidth == 1) &&
> >> - (op->dummy.nbytes == 0) &&
> >> + (op->dummy.ncycles == 0) &&
> >> (op->data.buswidth == 1))
> >> return true;
> >> break;
> >> @@ -515,17 +518,20 @@ static int mtk_nor_spi_mem_prg(struct mtk_nor *sp, const struct spi_mem_op *op)
> >> int tx_len, prg_len;
> >> int i, ret;
> >> void __iomem *reg;
> >
> >> - u8 bufbyte;
> >> + u8 bufbyte, dummy_nbytes = (op->dummy.ncycles * op->dummy.buswidth) / 8;
> >> +
> >> + if (op->dummy.dtr)
> >> + dummy_nbytes *= 2;
> >
> > ditto
> >
> >>
> >> tx_len = op->cmd.nbytes + op->addr.nbytes;
> >>
> >> // count dummy bytes only if we need to write data after it
> >> if (op->data.dir == SPI_MEM_DATA_OUT)
> >> - tx_len += op->dummy.nbytes + op->data.nbytes;
> >> + tx_len += dummy_nbytes + op->data.nbytes;
> >> else if (op->data.dir == SPI_MEM_DATA_IN)
> >> rx_len = op->data.nbytes;
> >>
> >> - prg_len = op->cmd.nbytes + op->addr.nbytes + op->dummy.nbytes +
> >> + prg_len = op->cmd.nbytes + op->addr.nbytes + dummy_nbytes +
> >> op->data.nbytes;
> >>
> >> // an invalid op may reach here if the caller calls exec_op without
> >> @@ -550,7 +556,7 @@ static int mtk_nor_spi_mem_prg(struct mtk_nor *sp, const struct spi_mem_op *op)
> >> }
> >>
> >> if (op->data.dir == SPI_MEM_DATA_OUT) {
> >> - for (i = 0; i < op->dummy.nbytes; i++, reg_offset--) {
> >> + for (i = 0; i < dummy_nbytes; i++, reg_offset--) {
> >> reg = sp->base + MTK_NOR_REG_PRGDATA(reg_offset);
> >> writeb(0, reg);
> >> }
> >
> > [...]
> >
> >> diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-zynq-qspi.c b/drivers/spi/spi-zynq-qspi.c
> >> index 78f31b61a2aa..84b7db85548c 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/spi/spi-zynq-qspi.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-zynq-qspi.c
> >> @@ -527,7 +527,10 @@ static int zynq_qspi_exec_mem_op(struct spi_mem *mem,
> >> {
> >> struct zynq_qspi *xqspi = spi_controller_get_devdata(mem->spi->master);
> >> int err = 0, i;
> >> - u8 *tmpbuf;
> >> + u8 *tmpbuf, dummy_nbytes = (op->dummy.ncycles * op->dummy.buswidth) / 8;
> >
> > Separate line?
Too long. Split the declaration and initialization up.
> >
> >> +
> >> + if (op->dummy.dtr)
> >> + dummy_nbytes *= 2;
> >
> > Is DTR supported by the driver?
> >
>
>
> Not from what I can see, but I was not 100% sure so I placed this if
> statement here just in case.
spi_mem_default_supports_op() will return false for the DTR-available
transfers anyway. So the spi_mem_exec_op() method will fail right at
the start and this part will never be executed if the DTR-mode is
requested.
-Sergey
>
>
>
> >>
> >> dev_dbg(xqspi->dev, "cmd:%#x mode:%d.%d.%d.%d\n",
> >> op->cmd.opcode, op->cmd.buswidth, op->addr.buswidth,
> >> @@ -568,17 +571,17 @@ static int zynq_qspi_exec_mem_op(struct spi_mem *mem,
> >> err = -ETIMEDOUT;
> >> }
> >>
> >> - if (op->dummy.nbytes) {
> >> - tmpbuf = kzalloc(op->dummy.nbytes, GFP_KERNEL);
> >> + if (dummy_nbytes) {
> >> + tmpbuf = kzalloc(dummy_nbytes, GFP_KERNEL);
> >> if (!tmpbuf)
> >> return -ENOMEM;
> >>
> >> - memset(tmpbuf, 0xff, op->dummy.nbytes);
> >> + memset(tmpbuf, 0xff, dummy_nbytes);
> >> reinit_completion(&xqspi->data_completion);
> >> xqspi->txbuf = tmpbuf;
> >> xqspi->rxbuf = NULL;
> >> - xqspi->tx_bytes = op->dummy.nbytes;
> >> - xqspi->rx_bytes = op->dummy.nbytes;
> >> + xqspi->tx_bytes = dummy_nbytes;
> >> + xqspi->rx_bytes = dummy_nbytes;
> >> zynq_qspi_write_op(xqspi, ZYNQ_QSPI_FIFO_DEPTH, true);
> >> zynq_qspi_write(xqspi, ZYNQ_QSPI_IEN_OFFSET,
> >> ZYNQ_QSPI_IXR_RXTX_MASK);
> >> diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-zynqmp-gqspi.c b/drivers/spi/spi-zynqmp-gqspi.c
> >> index c760aac070e5..b41abadef9a6 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/spi/spi-zynqmp-gqspi.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-zynqmp-gqspi.c
> >> @@ -948,6 +948,10 @@ static int zynqmp_qspi_exec_op(struct spi_mem *mem,
> >> u32 genfifoentry = 0;
> >> u16 opcode = op->cmd.opcode;
> >> u64 opaddr;
> >
> >> + u8 dummy_nbytes = (op->dummy.ncycles * op->dummy.buswidth) / 8;
> >> +
> >> + if (op->dummy.dtr)
> >> + dummy_nbytes *= 2;
> >
> > ditto
> >
> >>
> >> dev_dbg(xqspi->dev, "cmd:%#x mode:%d.%d.%d.%d\n",
> >> op->cmd.opcode, op->cmd.buswidth, op->addr.buswidth,
> >> @@ -1006,14 +1010,14 @@ static int zynqmp_qspi_exec_op(struct spi_mem *mem,
> >> }
> >> }
> >>
> >> - if (op->dummy.nbytes) {
> >> + if (dummy_nbytes) {
> >> xqspi->txbuf = NULL;
> >> xqspi->rxbuf = NULL;
> >> /*
> >> * xqspi->bytes_to_transfer here represents the dummy circles
> >> * which need to be sent.
> >> */
> >> - xqspi->bytes_to_transfer = op->dummy.nbytes * 8 / op->dummy.buswidth;
> >> + xqspi->bytes_to_transfer = dummy_nbytes;
> >> xqspi->bytes_to_receive = 0;
> >> /*
> >> * Using op->data.buswidth instead of op->dummy.buswidth here because
> >> diff --git a/include/linux/spi/spi-mem.h b/include/linux/spi/spi-mem.h
> >> index 2ba044d0d5e5..5fd45800af03 100644
> >> --- a/include/linux/spi/spi-mem.h
> >> +++ b/include/linux/spi/spi-mem.h
> >> @@ -29,9 +29,9 @@
> >>
> >> #define SPI_MEM_OP_NO_ADDR { }
> >>
> >
> >> -#define SPI_MEM_OP_DUMMY(__nbytes, __buswidth) \
> >> +#define SPI_MEM_OP_DUMMY(__ncycles, __buswidth) \
> >> { \
> >
> >> - .nbytes = __nbytes, \
> >> + .ncycles = __ncycles, \
> >> .buswidth = __buswidth, \
> >
> > Please make sure this update and the drivers/spi/spi-mem.c driver
> > alterations are coherent with the SPI Nand driver. See the macro usages:
> > include/linux/mtd/spinand.h: SPINAND_PAGE_READ_FROM_*().
> >
> > -Sergey
> >
>
>
> Yes, indeed, I should have paid more attention here. As I have
> previously said, I simply replaced dummy.nbytes with the code sequences
> you now see. I should have checked for SPI_MEM_OP_DUMMY usages as well
> since I changed its definition. Thank you! :)
>
>
> >> }
> >>
> >> @@ -83,8 +83,8 @@ enum spi_mem_data_dir {
> >> * Note that only @addr.nbytes are taken into account in this
> >> * address value, so users should make sure the value fits in the
> >> * assigned number of bytes.
> >> - * @dummy.nbytes: number of dummy bytes to send after an opcode or address. Can
> >> - * be zero if the operation does not require dummy bytes
> >> + * @dummy.ncycles: number of dummy cycles after an opcode or address. Can
> >> + * be zero if the operation does not require dummy cycles
> >> * @dummy.buswidth: number of IO lanes used to transmit the dummy bytes
> >> * @dummy.dtr: whether the dummy bytes should be sent in DTR mode or not
> >> * @data.buswidth: number of IO lanes used to send/receive the data
> >> @@ -112,7 +112,7 @@ struct spi_mem_op {
> >> } addr;
> >>
> >> struct {
> >> - u8 nbytes;
> >> + u8 ncycles;
> >> u8 buswidth;
> >> u8 dtr : 1;
> >> } dummy;
> >> --
> >> 2.34.1
> >>
>
>
> Regards,
> Sergiu
More information about the Linux-rockchip
mailing list