[PATCH 1/1] dt-bindings: pwm: rockchip: Add description for rk3588
Sebastian Reichel
sebastian.reichel at collabora.com
Tue Sep 13 07:16:01 PDT 2022
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 13, 2022 at 11:12:02AM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> Hello Rob,
>
> On Thu, Sep 01, 2022 at 02:14:55PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> > On Thu, 01 Sep 2022 15:55:23 +0200, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> > > Add "rockchip,rk3588-pwm" compatible string for PWM nodes found
> > > on a rk3588 platform.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel at collabora.com>
> > > ---
> > > No driver changes required.
> > > ---
> > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-rockchip.yaml | 1 +
> > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> > >
> >
> > Running 'make dtbs_check' with the schema in this patch gives the
> > following warnings. Consider if they are expected or the schema is
> > incorrect. These may not be new warnings.
> >
> > Note that it is not yet a requirement to have 0 warnings for dtbs_check.
> > This will change in the future.
>
> Is this a list of *new* warnings, or is the report (somewhat) orthogonal
> to the actual change and you just used the opportunity that someone
> touched the pwm-rockchip binding to point out that there is some cleanup
> to do?
>
> > Full log is available here: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/
>
> Hm, that gives me a 404.
This is an existing problem with the rv1108 binding.
The rk3588 does not have pwm interrupts.
-- Sebastian
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-rockchip/attachments/20220913/eb98c573/attachment.sig>
More information about the Linux-rockchip
mailing list