[PATCH 0/7] ASoC: codecs: da7219: Do not export da7219_aad_jack_det()

[Mark Brown]

On Mon, 31 Oct 2022 17:02:20 +0100, Cezary Rojewski wrote:
> Goal of the series is to drop any usage of the internal function.
> 
> First, update all users to utilize component->set_jack() and then remove
> the relevant EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL.
> 
> Amadeusz Sławiński (2):
>   ASoC: codecs: da7219: Introduce set_jack() callback
>   ASoC: codecs: da7219: Do not export internal symbols
> 
> [...]

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/7] ASoC: codecs: da7219: Introduce set_jack() callback
      commit: 4366b7ca88f04237ae654846167db993dbe37397
[2/7] ASoC: Intel: Drop da7219_aad_jack_det() usage
      commit: 9a1fe79daddbdc57307bd7dd9a29ef06aa7b5f34
[3/7] ASoC: mediatek: Drop da7219_aad_jack_det() usage
      commit: 922a5e5a6389da46b51075301440d07e53c600ea
[4/7] ASoC: rockchip: Drop da7219_aad_jack_det() usage
      commit: ebe62df7c50e63d11c7fdfbdff701583cd4f1f3a
[5/7] ASoC: amd: Drop da7219_aad_jack_det() usage
      commit: ba54da32ec683692ed69ffbed5b4afb414def7d2
[6/7] ASoC: Intel: avs: Drop da7219_aad_jack_det() usage
      commit: 7af1ca5bb5e3c2e472a040f8b52382ccc57bb01a
[7/7] ASoC: codecs: da7219: Do not export internal symbols
      commit: c05dff38d21556c532032f63330271b96265d448

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark