[PATCH 02/22] dt-bindings: power: Add power-domain header for RV1126

[Jagan Teki]

On Wed, 27 Jul 2022 at 12:46, Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzysztof.kozlowski at linaro.org> wrote:
>
> On 27/07/2022 09:09, Jagan Teki wrote:
> > On Wed, 27 Jul 2022 at 12:31, Krzysztof Kozlowski
> > <krzysztof.kozlowski at linaro.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 27/07/2022 08:52, Jagan Teki wrote:
> >>> On Tue, 26 Jul 2022 at 19:22, Krzysztof Kozlowski
> >>> <krzysztof.kozlowski at linaro.org> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> On 26/07/2022 15:44, Jagan Teki wrote:
> >>>>> On Sun, 24 Jul 2022 at 02:28, Krzysztof Kozlowski
> >>>>> <krzysztof.kozlowski at linaro.org> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On 23/07/2022 22:43, Jagan Teki wrote:
> >>>>>>> Add power-domain header for RV1126 SoC from description in TRM.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Elaine Zhang <zhangqing at rock-chips.com>
> >>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Jagan Teki <jagan at edgeble.ai>
> >>>>>>> ---
> >>>>>>>  include/dt-bindings/power/rv1126-power.h | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >>>>>>>  1 file changed, 34 insertions(+)
> >>>>>>>  create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/power/rv1126-power.h
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/power/rv1126-power.h b/include/dt-bindings/power/rv1126-power.h
> >>>>>>> new file mode 100644
> >>>>>>> index 000000000000..f15930ff06f7
> >>>>>>> --- /dev/null
> >>>>>>> +++ b/include/dt-bindings/power/rv1126-power.h
> >>>>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
> >>>>>>> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Dual license and a blank line,  please.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Yes, all rockchip power includes (at least here) are GPL-2.0 what is
> >>>>> the issue with it?
> >>>>
> >>>> The headers are part of bindings and all bindings should be dual
> >>>> licensed, so they can be used in other projects.
> >>>>
> >>>> Of course if copyright holder does not agree to release it on BSD, then
> >>>> it would be fine as exception. Also would be fine from us not to accept
> >>>> such bindings. :)
> >>>
> >>> I don't hold anything here to use dual-licensing. The only thing I'm
> >>> wondering here is none of the rockchip power includes (which are
> >>> merged) are using dual-licensing they simply have GPL-2.0 which is
> >>> used in BSP.  Let me know what you suggest?
> >>
> >> Hm, I think you asked this above and I answered that dual license should
> >> be used. Maybe we misunderstand each other?
> >
> > Sorry, I'm asking again as I'm liable to change the license here or not.
> >
> >>
> >> Do you include in this header any work which cannot be licensed on BSD
> >> (e.g. is derivative of existing GPL-2 work)?
> >
> > Yes, it is from BSP
> > https://github.com/rockchip-linux/kernel/blob/develop-4.19/include/dt-bindings/power/rv1126-power.h
>
> Eh... if you don't have permission to relicense it and you copied the
> IDs (although one would say it is not really copyrightable work), then
> let it be GPL-2.0. In the future just write the IDs by yourself (not as
> derivative work) and dual-license the header.

Yes, I usually follow the dual-license if I wrote new ones in bindings.

Thanks for the details.

Jagan.