[PATCH 02/22] dt-bindings: power: Add power-domain header for RV1126

[Jagan Teki]

On Wed, 27 Jul 2022 at 12:31, Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzysztof.kozlowski at linaro.org> wrote:
>
> On 27/07/2022 08:52, Jagan Teki wrote:
> > On Tue, 26 Jul 2022 at 19:22, Krzysztof Kozlowski
> > <krzysztof.kozlowski at linaro.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 26/07/2022 15:44, Jagan Teki wrote:
> >>> On Sun, 24 Jul 2022 at 02:28, Krzysztof Kozlowski
> >>> <krzysztof.kozlowski at linaro.org> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> On 23/07/2022 22:43, Jagan Teki wrote:
> >>>>> Add power-domain header for RV1126 SoC from description in TRM.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Elaine Zhang <zhangqing at rock-chips.com>
> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Jagan Teki <jagan at edgeble.ai>
> >>>>> ---
> >>>>>  include/dt-bindings/power/rv1126-power.h | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >>>>>  1 file changed, 34 insertions(+)
> >>>>>  create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/power/rv1126-power.h
> >>>>>
> >>>>> diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/power/rv1126-power.h b/include/dt-bindings/power/rv1126-power.h
> >>>>> new file mode 100644
> >>>>> index 000000000000..f15930ff06f7
> >>>>> --- /dev/null
> >>>>> +++ b/include/dt-bindings/power/rv1126-power.h
> >>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
> >>>>> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
> >>>>
> >>>> Dual license and a blank line,  please.
> >>>
> >>> Yes, all rockchip power includes (at least here) are GPL-2.0 what is
> >>> the issue with it?
> >>
> >> The headers are part of bindings and all bindings should be dual
> >> licensed, so they can be used in other projects.
> >>
> >> Of course if copyright holder does not agree to release it on BSD, then
> >> it would be fine as exception. Also would be fine from us not to accept
> >> such bindings. :)
> >
> > I don't hold anything here to use dual-licensing. The only thing I'm
> > wondering here is none of the rockchip power includes (which are
> > merged) are using dual-licensing they simply have GPL-2.0 which is
> > used in BSP.  Let me know what you suggest?
>
> Hm, I think you asked this above and I answered that dual license should
> be used. Maybe we misunderstand each other?

Sorry, I'm asking again as I'm liable to change the license here or not.

>
> Do you include in this header any work which cannot be licensed on BSD
> (e.g. is derivative of existing GPL-2 work)?

Yes, it is from BSP
https://github.com/rockchip-linux/kernel/blob/develop-4.19/include/dt-bindings/power/rv1126-power.h

Thanks,
Jagan.