[PATCH v2 02/20] dt-bindings: power: Add power-domain header for RV1126
Jagan Teki
jagan at edgeble.ai
Wed Aug 3 04:30:03 PDT 2022
On Wed, 3 Aug 2022 at 16:57, Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzysztof.kozlowski at linaro.org> wrote:
>
> On 03/08/2022 12:46, Jagan Teki wrote:
> > On Wed, 3 Aug 2022 at 16:13, Krzysztof Kozlowski
> > <krzysztof.kozlowski at linaro.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 03/08/2022 12:24, Jagan Teki wrote:
> >>>> Vendor in filename is needed.
> >>>
> >>> Yes this follows how similar rockchip vendor notation
> >>>
> >>> $ ls include/dt-bindings/power/rk3* -l
> >>> include/dt-bindings/power/rk3036-power.h
> >>> include/dt-bindings/power/rk3066-power.h
> >>> include/dt-bindings/power/rk3128-power.h
> >>> include/dt-bindings/power/rk3188-power.h
> >>> include/dt-bindings/power/rk3228-power.h
> >>> include/dt-bindings/power/rk3288-power.h
> >>> include/dt-bindings/power/rk3328-power.h
> >>> include/dt-bindings/power/rk3366-power.h
> >>> include/dt-bindings/power/rk3368-power.h
> >>> include/dt-bindings/power/rk3399-power.h
> >>> include/dt-bindings/power/rk3568-power.h
> >>
> >>
> >> So when are we going to switch to vendor,device pattern if you keep
> >> adding files with wrong naming?
> >
> > Do you mean the above files are following the wrong naming pattern?
>
> Yes, or at least discouraged naming. The recommended naming which I hope
> all new files will follow are vendor,device.h.
rockchip-rv1126-power.h
Will this be Okay?
Thanks,
Jagan.
More information about the Linux-rockchip
mailing list