[PATCH v4] PCI: of: Clear 64-bit flag for non-prefetchable memory below 4GB
Bjorn Helgaas
helgaas at kernel.org
Fri Jun 18 08:32:54 PDT 2021
On Fri, Jun 18, 2021 at 03:55:43PM +0200, Domenico Andreoli wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 06:12:34PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 08:04:57AM +0900, Punit Agrawal wrote:
> > > Alexandru and Qu reported this resource allocation failure on
> > > ROCKPro64 v2 and ROCK Pi 4B, both based on the RK3399:
> > >
> > > pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [mem 0xfa000000-0xfbdfffff 64bit]
> > > pci 0000:00:00.0: PCI bridge to [bus 01]
> > > pci 0000:00:00.0: BAR 14: no space for [mem size 0x00100000]
> > > pci 0000:01:00.0: reg 0x10: [mem 0x00000000-0x00003fff 64bit]
> > >
> > > "BAR 14" is the PCI bridge's 32-bit non-prefetchable window, and our
> > > PCI allocation code isn't smart enough to allocate it in a host
> > > bridge window marked as 64-bit, even though this should work fine.
> > >
> > > A DT host bridge description includes the windows from the CPU
> > > address space to the PCI bus space. On a few architectures
> > > (microblaze, powerpc, sparc), the DT may also describe PCI devices
> > > themselves, including their BARs.
> > >
> > > Before 9d57e61bf723 ("of/pci: Add IORESOURCE_MEM_64 to resource
> > > flags for 64-bit memory addresses"), of_bus_pci_get_flags() ignored
> > > the fact that some DT addresses described 64-bit windows and BARs.
> > > That was a problem because the virtio virtual NIC has a 32-bit BAR
> > > and a 64-bit BAR, and the driver couldn't distinguish them.
> > >
> > > 9d57e61bf723 set IORESOURCE_MEM_64 for those 64-bit DT ranges, which
> > > fixed the virtio driver. But it also set IORESOURCE_MEM_64 for host
> > > bridge windows, which exposed the fact that the PCI allocator isn't
> > > smart enough to put 32-bit resources in those 64-bit windows.
> > >
> > > Clear IORESOURCE_MEM_64 from host bridge windows since we don't need
> > > that information.
> > >
> > > Fixes: 9d57e61bf723 ("of/pci: Add IORESOURCE_MEM_64 to resource flags for 64-bit memory addresses")
> > > Reported-at: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/7a1e2ebc-f7d8-8431-d844-41a9c36a8911@arm.com/
> > > Reported-by: Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei at arm.com>
> > > Reported-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu at suse.com>
> > > Suggested-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas at google.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Punit Agrawal <punitagrawal at gmail.com>
> > > Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas at google.com>
> > > Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt at kernel.org>
> >
> > Applied with:
> >
> > Tested-by: Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei at arm.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh at kernel.org>
> > Acked-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb at kernel.org>
> >
> > to for-linus for v5.13, thanks a lot!
>
> Late-tested-by: Domenico Andreoli <domenico.andreoli at linux.com>
>
> See https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/YMyTUv7Jsd89PGci@m4/T/#u
I updated the commit to add your report and tested-by, thanks!
More information about the Linux-rockchip
mailing list