[PATCH v3 4/4] arm64: dts: rockchip: Update PCI host bridge window to 32-bit address memory
Heiko Stübner
heiko at sntech.de
Tue Jun 15 14:49:07 PDT 2021
Am Dienstag, 15. Juni 2021, 23:29:12 CEST schrieb Rob Herring:
> On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 at 3:50 PM Heiko Stübner <heiko at sntech.de> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Am Montag, 7. Juni 2021, 13:28:56 CEST schrieb Punit Agrawal:
> > > The PCIe host bridge on RK3399 advertises a single 64-bit memory
> > > address range even though it lies entirely below 4GB.
> > >
> > > Previously the OF PCI range parser treated 64-bit ranges more
> > > leniently (i.e., as 32-bit), but since commit 9d57e61bf723 ("of/pci:
> > > Add IORESOURCE_MEM_64 to resource flags for 64-bit memory addresses")
> > > the code takes a stricter view and treats the ranges as advertised in
> > > the device tree (i.e, as 64-bit).
> > >
> > > The change in behaviour causes failure when allocating bus addresses
> > > to devices connected behind a PCI-to-PCI bridge that require
> > > non-prefetchable memory ranges. The allocation failure was observed
> > > for certain Samsung NVMe drives connected to RockPro64 boards.
> > >
> > > Update the host bridge window attributes to treat it as 32-bit address
> > > memory. This fixes the allocation failure observed since commit
> > > 9d57e61bf723.
> > >
> > > Reported-by: Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei at arm.com>
> > > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/7a1e2ebc-f7d8-8431-d844-41a9c36a8911@arm.com
> > > Suggested-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy at arm.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Punit Agrawal <punitagrawal at gmail.com>
> > > Tested-by: Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei at arm.com>
> > > Cc: Heiko Stuebner <heiko at sntech.de>
> > > Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt at kernel.org>
> >
> > just for clarity, should I just pick this patch separately for 5.13-rc to
> > make it easy for people using current kernel devicetrees, or should
> > this wait for the update mentioned in the cover-letter response
> > and should go all together through the PCI tree?
>
> This was dropped from v4, but should still be applied IMO.
It was probably dropped because I applied it ;-)
It's part of armsoc already [0] and should make its way into
5.13 shortly.
Heiko
[0] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/soc/soc.git/commit/?h=arm/fixes&id=8efe01b4386ab38a36b99cfdc1dc02c38a8898c3
>
> Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh at kernel.org>
>
More information about the Linux-rockchip
mailing list