[PATCH v4 0/7] arm64: dts: rockchip: Add Engicam PX30.Core

[Heiko Stuebner]

Hi,

Am Dienstag, 29. September 2020, 10:32:10 CET schrieb Jagan Teki:
> PX30.Core is an EDIMM SOM based on Rockchip PX30 from Engicam.
> 
> PX30.Core needs to mount on top of Engicam baseboards for creating
> complete platform boards.
> 
> Possible baseboards are,
> - EDIMM2.2 Starter Kit
> - C.TOUCH 2.0 Carrier Board
> 
> Changes for v4:
> - collect Rob A-b
> Changes for v3:
> - resolved Johan comments about sorting node properties
> - add copyright to Amarula Solutions
> - update px30 dtsi author
> Changes for v2:
> - include C.TOUCH 2.0 carrier board
> - skip 10" OF LCD as it requires separate dts with panel support.
> 
> Note: These baseboards can be used for i.MX8 SOM's as well. So having
> baseboard on respective SoC seems to be easy rather than making it
> common across all.
> 
> Any inputs?
> Jagan.
> 
> Jagan Teki (6):
>   dt-bindings: arm: rockchip: Add Engicam PX30.Core EDIMM2.2 Starter Kit
>   arm64: dts: rockchip: px30: Add Engicam EDIMM2.2 Starter Kit
>   arm64: dts: rockchip: Add Engicam PX30.Core EDIMM2.2 Starter Kit
>   dt-bindings: arm: rockchip: Add Engicam PX30.Core C.TOUCH 2.0
>   arm64: dts: rockchip: px30: Add Engicam C.TOUCH 2.0
>   arm64: dts: rockchip: Add Engicam PX30.Core C.TOUCH 2.0
> 
> Michael Trimarchi (1):
>   arm64: dts: rockchip: Add Engicam PX30.Core SOM

I've applied the patches for 5.11 with some changes:
(1) engicam,px30-px30-core became engicam,px30-core
(2) px30-px30-core.dtsi became px30-engicam-px30-core.dtsi

That double px30 is unnecessary and confusing in compatibles
and the px30-core thingy needed something less generic, as that is
not px30-specific but specific to the engicam boards.


Heiko