[PATCH v5 1/5] pwm-backlight: enable/disable the PWM before/after LCD enable toggle.

[Enric Balletbo Serra]

Hi,

2017-12-01 13:06 GMT+01:00 Enric Balletbo i Serra
<enric.balletbo at collabora.com>:
> Before this patch the enable signal was set before the PWM signal and
> vice-versa on power off. This sequence is wrong, at least, it is on
> the different panels datasheets that I checked, so I inverted the sequence
> to follow the specs.
>
> For reference the following panels have the mentioned sequence:
>   - N133HSE-EA1 (Innolux)
>   - N116BGE (Innolux)
>   - N156BGE-L21 (Innolux)
>   - B101EAN0 (Auo)
>   - B101AW03 (Auo)
>   - LTN101NT05 (Samsung)
>   - CLAA101WA01A (Chunghwa)
>
> Signed-off-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo at collabora.com>
> Acked-by: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson at linaro.org>
> Acked-by: Jingoo Han <jingoohan1 at gmail.com>
> ---
> Changes since v4:
>  - Rebase on top of mainline.
>  - Add the acks from Daniel Thompson and Jingoo Han.
> Changes since v3:
>  - List the part numbers for the panel checked (Daniel Thompson)
> Changes since v2:
>  - Add this as a separate patch (Thierry Reding)
> Changes since v1:
>  - None
>
>  drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c | 9 +++++----
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c b/drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c
> index 1c2289d..698ec68 100644
> --- a/drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c
> +++ b/drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c
> @@ -54,10 +54,11 @@ static void pwm_backlight_power_on(struct pwm_bl_data *pb, int brightness)
>         if (err < 0)
>                 dev_err(pb->dev, "failed to enable power supply\n");
>
> +       pwm_enable(pb->pwm);
> +
>         if (pb->enable_gpio)
>                 gpiod_set_value_cansleep(pb->enable_gpio, 1);
>
> -       pwm_enable(pb->pwm);
>         pb->enabled = true;
>  }
>
> @@ -66,12 +67,12 @@ static void pwm_backlight_power_off(struct pwm_bl_data *pb)
>         if (!pb->enabled)
>                 return;
>
> -       pwm_config(pb->pwm, 0, pb->period);
> -       pwm_disable(pb->pwm);
> -
>         if (pb->enable_gpio)
>                 gpiod_set_value_cansleep(pb->enable_gpio, 0);
>
> +       pwm_config(pb->pwm, 0, pb->period);
> +       pwm_disable(pb->pwm);
> +
>         regulator_disable(pb->power_supply);
>         pb->enabled = false;
>  }
> --
> 2.9.3
>

A gentle ping, It's been nearly two months since I sent this patchset,
there is anything else that prevents these patches to land or
incorporate in linux-next?

Thanks,
 Enric