[RESEND PATCH v5 2/5] dt-bindings: pwm-backlight: add PWM delay proprieties.

[Heiko Stuebner]

Hi Lee,

Am Montag, 19. Februar 2018, 10:22:47 CET schrieb Lee Jones:
> On Fri, 16 Feb 2018, Enric Balletbo i Serra wrote:
> 
> > Hardware needs a delay between setting an initial (non-zero) PWM and
> > enabling the backlight using GPIO. The post-pwm-on-delay-ms specifies
> > this delay in milli seconds. Hardware also needs a delay between disabing
> > the backlight using GPIO and setting PWM value to 0. The pwm-off-delay-ms
> > is this delay in milli seconds.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo at collabora.com>
> > Acked-by: Pavel Machek <pavel at ucw.cz>
> > ---
> > Based on the original Huang Lin <hl at rock-chips.com> work.
> > 
> > Changes since v4:
> >  - Rebase on top of mainline.
> > Changes since v3:
> >  - Replace us for ms.
> >  - Add Acked-by: Pavel Machek <pavel at ucw.cz>
> > Changes since v2:
> >  - Use separate properties (Rob Herring)
> > Changes since v1:
> >  - As suggested by Daniel Thompson
> >    - Do not assume power-on delay and power-off delay will be the same
> > 
> >  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/backlight/pwm-backlight.txt | 6 ++++++
> >  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> 
> Looks like this still needs an Ack.
> 
> Also, you didn't supply a 0th (cover-letter) patch, so I have no idea
> of patch history or your future intentions.
> 
> Are there build-time dependencies between them or can each patch be
> merged via their respective trees without the fear of merge/build
> failure?

When looking at the patches, there do not seem to be any build-time
dependencies between the patch 1-3 (backlight) and 4+5 devicetree,
so after Rob hopefully has time to look at the binding change, I'd suspect
you take the code changes and I'll take the dts changes.


Heiko