[PATCH] drm/bridge/synopsys: dsi: use adjusted_mode in mode_set

Mon Apr 23 03:10:31 PDT 2018

Hi Philippe,

On Thursday, 8 February 2018 15:15:40 EEST Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> On Saturday, 3 February 2018 00:41:26 EET Philippe CORNU wrote:
> > On 01/29/2018 11:40 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > > On Monday, 29 January 2018 12:17:37 EET Philippe CORNU wrote:
> > >> On 01/29/2018 10:46 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > >>> On Thursday, 25 January 2018 17:55:04 EET Philippe Cornu wrote:
> > >>>> The "adjusted_mode" clock value (ie the real pixel clock) is more
> > >>>> accurate than "mode" clock value (ie the panel/bridge requested
> > >>>> clock value). It offers a better preciseness for timing
> > >>>> computations and allows to reduce the extra dsi bandwidth in
> > >>>> burst mode (from ~20% to ~10-12%, hw platform dependant).
> > >>>> 
> > >>>> Signed-off-by: Philippe Cornu <philippe.cornu at st.com>
> > >>> 
> > >>> The adjusted mode is documented as
> > >>> 
> > >>>   /**
> > >>>   
> > >>>    * @adjusted_mode:
> > >>>    *
> > >>>    * Internal display timings which can be used by the driver to
> > >>>    handle
> > >>>    * differences between the mode requested by userspace in @mode and
> > >>>    what
> > >>>    * is actually programmed into the hardware. It is purely driver
> > >>>    * implementation defined what exactly this adjusted mode means.
> > >>>    Usually
> > >>>    * it is used to store the hardware display timings used between the
> > >>>    * CRTC and encoder blocks.
> > >>>    */
> > >>> 
> > >>> This is easy to handle when the CRTC and encoder are controlled by the
> > >>> same driver, as the field is "implementation defined" by a single
> > >>> driver. However, when using bridges, there are two drivers involved,
> > >>> and
> > >>> they must both agree to meaningfully use the adjusted mode. I can't
> > >>> see
> > >>> how to do so without standardizing the meaning of the adjusted mode
> > >>> field.
> > >> 
> > >> This is exactly the reason why my first implementation used the dsi
> > >> bridge "optional pixel clock" instead of the adjusted_mode (see [1])
> > >> 
> > >> But after digging more into the drm source code, I think using
> > >> adjusted_mode instead of the pixel clock here brings more advantages
> > >> because:
> > >> * adjusted_mode is an argument of bridge mode_set() probably for being
> > >> used in any manner, maybe like this :)
> > >> * if the bridge "user" (crtc or a master bridge drivers) does not need
> > >> to modify its adjusted_mode then mode & adjusted_mode mode_set()
> > >> arguments will have the same values so "no consequence" for the bridge.
> > >> * if the bridge "user" (crtc or master bridge drivers) needs to adjust
> > >> any value of the mode then this adjustment is available for the bridge.
> > > 
> > > Remember that there can be multiple chained bridges, and a single
> > > adjusted mode field.
> > > 
> > >> * rockchip crtc updates a part of the mode (the clock), stm is doing
> > >> the
> > >> same (see [2]) but any future "user" of the dw_mipi_dsi bridge can
> > >> adjust something else (blankings...) and the dw_mipi_dsi bridge will be
> > >> then aware of...
> > >> 
> > >> But maybe it is a wrong usage of the "adjusted_mode offer"...
> > > 
> > > I don't disagree that there's a need for using adjusted values, but I
> > > believe we need to create a clear API to do so. Using the adjust_mode
> > > field as-is when it's clearly documented as being implementation-defined
> > > is asking for trouble.
> > 
> > Laurent, do you think we can use "adjusted mode" here in this small
> > patch as the actual 2 "users" of this bridge (rockchip & stm) use both
> > "adjusted mode" in their crtc?
> 
> The Synopsys DSI driver might only be used by two display controller drivers
> today, it is nonetheless a standard bridge driver that should not make any
> assumption of a particular use of the adjusted_mode in particular display
> controller drivers. To use the adjusted_mode value in bridge drivers we
> need to standardize its usage, otherwise we'll end up with
> incompatibilities between bridge drivers and display controller drivers.

Now that the documentation has been clarified I have no objection against this 
patch anymore.

> > >> [1] https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/200240/
> > >> [2] https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/200720/
> > >> 
> > >>> Daniel, what's your opinion on this ?
> > 
> > Daniel, any opinion on the adjusted_mode usage?
> > 
> > >>>> ---
> > >>>> Note: This patch replaces "drm/bridge/synopsys: dsi: add optional
> > >>>> pixel clock"
> > >>>> 
> > >>>> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/synopsys/dw-mipi-dsi.c | 12 ++++++------
> > >>>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> > >>>> 
> > >>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/synopsys/dw-mipi-dsi.c
> > >>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/synopsys/dw-mipi-dsi.c index
> > >>>> ed8af32f8e52..b926b62e9e33 100644
> > >>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/synopsys/dw-mipi-dsi.c
> > >>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/synopsys/dw-mipi-dsi.c
> > >>>> @@ -707,20 +707,20 @@ static void dw_mipi_dsi_bridge_mode_set(struct
> > >>>> drm_bridge *bridge,
> > >>>> 
> > >>>>    	clk_prepare_enable(dsi->pclk);
> > >>>> 
> > >>>> -	ret = phy_ops->get_lane_mbps(priv_data, mode, dsi->mode_flags,
> > >>>> +	ret = phy_ops->get_lane_mbps(priv_data, adjusted_mode,
> > >>>> dsi->mode_flags,
> > >>>> 
> > >>>>    				     dsi->lanes, dsi->format, &dsi->lane_mbps);
> > >>>>    
> > >>>>    if (ret)
> > >>>>    
> > >>>>    	DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("Phy get_lane_mbps() failed\n");
> > >>>>    
> > >>>>    pm_runtime_get_sync(dsi->dev);
> > >>>>    dw_mipi_dsi_init(dsi);
> > >>>> 
> > >>>> -	dw_mipi_dsi_dpi_config(dsi, mode);
> > >>>> +	dw_mipi_dsi_dpi_config(dsi, adjusted_mode);
> > >>>> 
> > >>>>    dw_mipi_dsi_packet_handler_config(dsi);
> > >>>>    dw_mipi_dsi_video_mode_config(dsi);
> > >>>> 
> > >>>> -	dw_mipi_dsi_video_packet_config(dsi, mode);
> > >>>> +	dw_mipi_dsi_video_packet_config(dsi, adjusted_mode);
> > >>>> 
> > >>>>    dw_mipi_dsi_command_mode_config(dsi);
> > >>>> 
> > >>>> -	dw_mipi_dsi_line_timer_config(dsi, mode);
> > >>>> -	dw_mipi_dsi_vertical_timing_config(dsi, mode);
> > >>>> +	dw_mipi_dsi_line_timer_config(dsi, adjusted_mode);
> > >>>> +	dw_mipi_dsi_vertical_timing_config(dsi, adjusted_mode);
> > >>>> 
> > >>>>    dw_mipi_dsi_dphy_init(dsi);
> > >>>>    dw_mipi_dsi_dphy_timing_config(dsi);
> > >>>> 
> > >>>> @@ -734,7 +734,7 @@ static void dw_mipi_dsi_bridge_mode_set(struct
> > >>>> drm_bridge *bridge,
> > >>>> 
> > >>>>    dw_mipi_dsi_dphy_enable(dsi);
> > >>>> 
> > >>>> -	dw_mipi_dsi_wait_for_two_frames(mode);
> > >>>> +	dw_mipi_dsi_wait_for_two_frames(adjusted_mode);
> > >>>> 
> > >>>>    /* Switch to cmd mode for panel-bridge pre_enable & panel prepare
> > >>>>    */
> > >>>>    dw_mipi_dsi_set_mode(dsi, 0);

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart