[PATCH v2 0/5] mmc: dw_mmc: Fix the CTO timer patch, plus the DTO timer

Doug Anderson dianders at chromium.org
Tue Oct 31 11:14:53 PDT 2017


Hi,

On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 12:05 AM, Shawn Lin <shawn.lin at rock-chips.com> wrote:
> Hi Ulf,
>
>
> On 2017/10/30 19:40, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>>
>> On 12 October 2017 at 22:11, Douglas Anderson <dianders at chromium.org>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Recently we landed 03de19212ea3 ("mmc: dw_mmc: introduce timer for
>>> broken command transfer over scheme").  I found a bunch of problems
>>> with that patch, so this series attempts to solve some of them.
>>>
>>> This also fixes the DTO timer in some of the same ways even though I
>>> haven't personally seen problems with the DTO timer.
>>>
>>> NOTE: this series has only been lighly tested so far.  I can at least
>>> reproduce the need for the CTO timer on one of my devices and so I can
>>> confirm that part still works.  As mentioned in the 3rd patch I also
>>> ran the mmc_test kernel module on this and did manage to see the 3rd
>>> patch doing something useful.
>>>
>>> Changes in v2:
>>> - Removed extra "int i"
>>> - Fix the DTO timeout calculation new for v2
>>> - Cleanup the DTO timer new for v2
>>>
>>> Douglas Anderson (5):
>>>    mmc: dw_mmc: cancel the CTO timer after a voltage switch
>>>    mmc: dw_mmc: Fix the CTO timeout calculation
>>>    mmc: dw_mmc: Add locking to the CTO timer
>>>    mmc: dw_mmc: Fix the DTO timeout calculation
>>>    mmc: dw_mmc: Cleanup the DTO timer like the CTO one
>>>
>>>   drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c | 162
>>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>>>   1 file changed, 146 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>>>
>>
>> Douglas, Jaehoon,
>>
>> I decided to pick patch 1->4 for fixes and the patch 5 for next, that
>> should help us to get them more tested, while Jaehoon is still
>> catching up.
>>
>> I can add ack/drop patches for yet a couple of days this week.
>
>
> Patch 4 introduce a warning:
>
> warning: unused variable ‘irqflags’ [-Wunused-variable]
>
> irqflags should be introduced in patch 5 in the same place.
> As it seems patch 5 will be candidate for 4.15, so could you please
> help fix patch 4 and 5 manually? Or Doug need to resend patch 4 and 5?

Thanks for catching this and sorry for the dumb screwup.  Ulf: I'm
happy to do do whatever makes it easiest for you.  If you want me to
re-post it should be very quick.

-Doug



More information about the Linux-rockchip mailing list