[PATCH 6/6] ARM: dts: rockchip: add efuse device node for rk3228

Frank Wang frank.wang at rock-chips.com
Fri Jun 16 02:24:23 PDT 2017


Hi Heiko,

On 2017/6/15 23:10, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
> Hi Frank,
>
> Am Donnerstag, 15. Juni 2017, 15:23:16 CEST schrieb Frank Wang:
>> From: Finley Xiao <finley.xiao at rock-chips.com>
>>
>> Add a efuse node in the device tree for the rk3228 SoC.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Finley Xiao <finley.xiao at rock-chips.com>
>> ---
>>   arch/arm/boot/dts/rk322x.dtsi | 17 +++++++++++++++++
>>   1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk322x.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk322x.dtsi
>> index c2a78f4..dad195e 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk322x.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk322x.dtsi
>> @@ -314,6 +314,23 @@
>>   		status = "disabled";
>>   	};
>>   
>> +	efuse: efuse at 11040000 {
>> +		compatible = "rockchip,rk322x-efuse";
> was this binding included already? Simply because compatibles should
> not contain placeholders, so rockchip,rk3228-efuse please - same for
> the driver side.

Actually, I always remember it should be without placeholders from the 
first time you commented :-)
but I saw that the binding and driver (rockchip,rk322x-efuse) have 
already been applied, so I send this one keep the same with driver side.
Shall I resend a new patch to correct both of them to 
'rockchip,rk3228-efuse' ?


BR.
Frank

>
> Heiko
>
>
>> +		reg = <0x11040000 0x20>;
>> +		#address-cells = <1>;
>> +		#size-cells = <1>;
>> +		clocks = <&cru PCLK_EFUSE_256>;
>> +		clock-names = "pclk_efuse";
>> +
>> +		/* Data cells */
>> +		efuse_id: id at 7 {
>> +			reg = <0x7 0x10>;
>> +		};
>> +		cpu_leakage: cpu_leakage at 17 {
>> +			reg = <0x17 0x1>;
>> +		};
>> +	};
>> +
>>   	i2c0: i2c at 11050000 {
>>   		compatible = "rockchip,rk3228-i2c";
>>   		reg = <0x11050000 0x1000>;
>>





More information about the Linux-rockchip mailing list