[v10,2/2] PCI: Rockchip: Add Rockchip PCIe controller support
Brian Norris
briannorris at chromium.org
Thu Sep 1 10:14:01 PDT 2016
On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 11:34:55AM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> In the interest of making progress, I made most of the changes Guenter
> suggested (thanks very much, Guenter!) and made some more of my own on
> top of those.
I'm not sure, but was this change your idea Bjorn?
commit 88cb3f59d73e261a3cd1957ff392f98c9916a5d1
Author: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas at google.com>
Date: Thu Sep 1 10:27:44 2016 -0500
Simplify the confusing HIWORD_UPDATE scheme.
[Which I'll summarize here; you're replacing the macro:
-/*
- * The higher 16-bit of this register is used for write protection
- * only if BIT(x + 16) set to 1 the BIT(x) can be written.
- */
-#define HIWORD_UPDATE(val, mask, shift) \
- ((val) << (shift) | (mask) << ((shift) + 16))
with its expansions:
+
+/*
+ * The higher 16-bit of this register is used for write protection
+ * only if BIT(x + 16) set to 1 the BIT(x) can be written.
+ */
+#define PCIE_CLIENT_CONF_ENABLE (0x00010000 | 0x0001)
+#define PCIE_CLIENT_LINK_TRAIN_ENABLE (0x00020000 | 0x0002)
+#define PCIE_CLIENT_ARI_ENABLE (0x00080000 | 0x0008)
+#define PCIE_CLIENT_CONF_LANE_NUM(x) (0x00300000 | (((x >> 1) & 3) << 4)
+#define PCIE_CLIENT_MODE_RC (0x00400000 | 0x0040)
+#define PCIE_CLIENT_GEN_SEL(x) (0x00800000 | ((x & 1) << 7)
+#define PCIE_CLIENT_GEN_SEL_0 0
+#define PCIE_CLIENT_GEN_SEL_2 1
Full change can be had by:
git fetch git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/helgaas/pci.git pci/host-rockchip-wip
]
The use of HIWORD_UPDATE can indeed be a bit confusing, IMO, but this is
really a common Rockchip-ism that, once you read several of their
drivers, can make a little more sense. If you grep around, it's in at
least their clock, ethernet, SDHCI, PHY, and DP/DRM drivers. I might
defer to Heiko (upstream maintainer of Rockchip code) for a decision.
Maybe there's some intermediate ground where we keep the HIWORK_UPDATE()
logic (it does make sure we get the 16-bit shift right, I think) while
still refactoring a few other bits (like PCIE_CLIENT_CONF_LANE_NUM() and
PCIE_CLIENT_GEN_SEL() for wrapping HIWORK_UPDATE()?).
Anyway, just a thought. If it really is most understandable to write it
this way, then maybe it's fine to be different than the other 16
rockchip files that have this pattern.
Brian
More information about the Linux-rockchip
mailing list