[PATCH v2] timers: Fix usleep_range() in the context of wake_up_process()
Brian Norris
briannorris at chromium.org
Tue Oct 11 11:54:28 PDT 2016
Hi Doug,
On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 02:04:02PM -0700, Doug Anderson wrote:
> Users of usleep_range() expect that it will _never_ return in less time
> than the minimum passed parameter. However, nothing in any of the code
> ensures this.
Like you and Andreas, I also don't understand Thomas's objection to your
above claim on what users of this function expect. I believe you have
clearly laid out why the current behavior needs to be changed somehow;
IMO the only remaining question is "how." Your follow up covers all this
plenty well for me.
Either we need a fix along the lines of what you've proposed, or else we
need to completely rethink almost all uses of usleep_range().
...
> Reported-by: Tao Huang <huangtao at rock-chips.com>
> Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders at chromium.org>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - Fixed stupid bug that snuck in before posting
> - Use ktime_before
> - Remove delta from the loop
>
> NOTE: Tested against 4.4 tree w/ backports. I'm trying to get myself
> up and running with mainline again to test there now but it might be a
> little while. Hopefully this time I don't shoot myself in the foot.
>
> kernel/time/timer.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
I've reviewed the logic here to the best of my ability, and it looks
good to me now. I'll admit that I'm not really a timekeeping or
scheduler expert, but FWIW:
Reviewed-by: Brian Norris <briannorris at chromium.org>
> diff --git a/kernel/time/timer.c b/kernel/time/timer.c
> index 32bf6f75a8fe..219439efd56a 100644
> --- a/kernel/time/timer.c
> +++ b/kernel/time/timer.c
> @@ -1898,12 +1898,28 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(msleep_interruptible);
>
> static void __sched do_usleep_range(unsigned long min, unsigned long max)
> {
> + ktime_t now, end;
> ktime_t kmin;
> u64 delta;
> + int ret;
>
> - kmin = ktime_set(0, min * NSEC_PER_USEC);
> + now = ktime_get();
> + end = ktime_add_us(now, min);
> delta = (u64)(max - min) * NSEC_PER_USEC;
> - schedule_hrtimeout_range(&kmin, delta, HRTIMER_MODE_REL);
> + do {
> + kmin = ktime_sub(end, now);
> + ret = schedule_hrtimeout_range(&kmin, delta, HRTIMER_MODE_REL);
> +
> + /*
> + * If schedule_hrtimeout_range() returns 0 then we actually
> + * hit the timeout. If not then we need to re-calculate the
> + * new timeout ourselves.
> + */
> + if (ret == 0)
> + break;
> +
> + now = ktime_get();
> + } while (ktime_before(now, end));
> }
>
> /**
> --
> 2.8.0.rc3.226.g39d4020
>
More information about the Linux-rockchip
mailing list