[PATCH v15 1/3] drm: rockchip: Add basic drm driver
Tomeu Vizoso
tomeu at tomeuvizoso.net
Thu Mar 17 06:49:46 PDT 2016
On 16 March 2016 at 16:23, Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu at tomeuvizoso.net> wrote:
> On 15 March 2016 at 02:30, Mark yao <mark.yao at rock-chips.com> wrote:
>> On 2016年03月14日 21:35, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
>>>
>>> On 2 December 2014 at 10:15, Mark Yao <mark.yao at rock-chips.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop.c
>>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop.c
>>>> new file mode 100644
>>>> index 0000000..e7ca25b
>>>> --- /dev/null
>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop.c
>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,1455 @@
>>>
>>> ...
>>>>
>>>> +static bool vop_crtc_mode_fixup(struct drm_crtc *crtc,
>>>> + const struct drm_display_mode *mode,
>>>> + struct drm_display_mode *adjusted_mode)
>>>> +{
>>>> + if (adjusted_mode->htotal == 0 || adjusted_mode->vtotal == 0)
>>>> + return false;
>>>
>>> Hi Mark,
>>>
>>> what's the rationale for this?
>>>
>>> Disabling a CRTC as in [0] will cause mode_fixup() to be called with
>>> an empty mode, failing that test.
>>>
>>> Removing the check seems to get things working fine for a short while,
>>> but a later modeset invariably gets the VOP to hang (as reported by
>>> [1]).
>>>
>>> Do you know why that check was put in place and what exactly could be
>>> causing the hw to hang?
>>>
>>> [0]
>>> https://cgit.freedesktop.org/xorg/app/intel-gpu-tools/tree/lib/igt_kms.c#n1616
>>> [1]
>>> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/tree/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop.c#n873
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Tomeu
>>>
>> Hi Tomeu
>>
>> Just thinking that "adjusted_mode->htotal == 0 || adjusted_mode->vtotal ==
>> 0" is not a good mode for vop.
>
> Ah, ok. Guess it should be removed then so we don't break userspace?
>
>> And you said VOP hang, only WARN_ON error message? or system hang, die?
>
> Sorry, the symptom was only the warning, I just went a bit too far and
> assumed the VOP had stopped working at all.
>
>> I think maybe crtc disable too fast, vblank is off, then no one can feed the
>> wait_update_complete.
>> Can you test it again with following patch?
>
> Actually, in today's testing I don't see that happening any more,
> sorry about that :/
>
> What I have been looking at today is a related issue when running the
> kms_flip_event_leak test from intel-gpu-tools. If I remove the check
> mentioned above so CRTCs can be disabled with the SetCRTC IOCTL, I see
> this page fault the second and subsequent times I run the test.
>
> [ 75.809031] rk_iommu ff930300.iommu: Page fault at 0x01000000 of type read
> [ 75.809035] rk_iommu ff930300.iommu: iova = 0x01000000: dte_index:
> 0x4 pte_index: 0x0 page_offset: 0x0
> [ 75.809040] rk_iommu ff930300.iommu: mmu_dte_addr: 0x2c258000
> dte at 0x2c258010: 0x2c561001 valid: 1 pte at 0x2c561000: 0x2a000006 valid:
> 0 page at 0x00000000 flags: 0x0
> [ 76.951288] rk_iommu ff930300.iommu: Enable stall request timed
> out, status: 0x00004b
>
> I have written a smaller standalone test that is attached in case you
> want to check it out, but I haven't been able to find out why it only
> happens when the test is rerun.
>
> Apparently the VOP is still trying to read a BO (0x01000000) right
> when the kernel frees it, but from what I can see, it should be
> scanning another BO at that point.
>
> Do you have any ideas on what could be happening?
Apparently, when the VOP is re-enabled, it will start scanning from
the framebuffer address that had been set last.
Because DMA addresses are recycled and there's going to be a low
number of framebuffers, this isn't going to be obvious unless we make
sure that there isn't a FB allocated at that DMA address any more.
The attached test case does just that.
Regards,
Tomeu
> Thanks,
>
> Tomeu
>
>> drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop.c
>> @@ -503,6 +503,8 @@ static void vop_crtc_disable(struct drm_crtc *crtc)
>> if (!vop->is_enabled)
>> return;
>> + vop_crtc_wait_for_update(crtc);
>> +
>> drm_crtc_vblank_off(crtc);
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> --
>> Mark Yao
>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: page_fault.c
Type: text/x-csrc
Size: 3588 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-rockchip/attachments/20160317/dcb50599/attachment-0001.bin>
More information about the Linux-rockchip
mailing list