[PATCH v3 00/12] pwm: add support for atomic update
Doug Anderson
dianders at google.com
Mon Mar 7 08:34:19 PST 2016
Thierry,
On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 3:14 PM, Doug Anderson <dianders at google.com> wrote:
> So just to summarize:
>
> * Add pwm_get_state(), pwm_apply_state(), pwm_get_args().
> pwm_get_state() initially returns 0 for duty cycle if driver doesn't
> support readout.
>
> * Re-implement pwm_get_period() (and maybe other similar functions)
> atop pwm_get_state() as you describe earlier in the thread.
>
> * Document pwm_get_period() (and maybe other similar functions) as deprecated.
>
> * Fix drivers for all current 2 users of PWM regulator to support
> hardware readout.
>
> * Update PWM regulator as you described earlier in the thread (Feb 23).
>
> * If PWM regulator is ever used on a new board whose PWM doesn't
> support hardware readout, the voltage will change at probe time.
>
>
> Did I get all that right? Thanks!
Can you provide a "yes, you got that right" or a "no, you didn't
understand"? That will unblock Boris, I think.
-Doug
More information about the Linux-rockchip
mailing list