[PATCH v2] arm64: dts: rockchip: add the power domain node for rk3399

Fri Jul 1 20:41:42 PDT 2016

Dear Caesar & Doug,

On 07/02/2016 09:34 AM, Caesar Wang wrote:
>
> On 2016年07月02日 00:56, Doug Anderson wrote:
>> Caesar
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 9:32 PM, Caesar Wang <wxt at rock-chips.com> wrote:
>>> From: Elaine Zhang <zhangqing at rock-chips.com>
>>>
>>> In order to meet low power requirements, a power management unit
>>> (PMU) is
>>> designed for controlling power resources in RK3399. The RK3399 PMU is
>>> dedicated for managing the power of the whole chip.
>>>
>>> 1. add pd node for RK3399 Soc
>>> 2. create power domain tree
>>> 3. add qos node for domain
>>>
>>> From the DT/binds and driver can get more detail information:
>>> The driver:
>>> drivers/soc/rockchip/pm_domains.c
>>> The document:
>>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/rockchip/power_domain.txt
>>> ---
>>>
>>> Changes in v2:
>>> - As Doug/Heiko commnets on
>>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9206415/.
>>> drop the debugfs-dump and Add the comments for alphabetical order.
>>>
>>> Note: As the TRM lists many voltage domains and power domains, then
>>> in actual we just need control some domains for driver.
>>> Due to some domains (e.g. emmc, usb, core)...We can't turn off it on
>>> bootup.
>> I'm curious: why can't you turn off USB power domains if a board
>> doesn't usb USB? ...or GMAC on boards that don't use Ethernet? ...or
>> eDP on boards that don't use EDP?
>>
>> Maybe the driver for these things isn't ready to handle power domains
>> yet so that's why they are left out for now?
>>
>> It seems like GMAC could at least be added because we don't even have
>> the GMAC listed in the current device tree so therefore there can't be
>> any users of it. When it's added we can make sure that the power
>> domains are added.
>
> At least, the gmac had been supported in rockchip inside.
> That's seem the gmac driver can't handle the power domain enough.
> -- 
>
> Frankly, I'm no test the GMAC，then this patch should support most of
> devices.
> We can send another patch to support it if someone（usb/gmac) can
> handle the power domain.
>
>>
>> I think in the current upstream dtsi file there is also no xhci node,
>> so does that mean you could add the USB3 power domain?
>>
>>
>
> willam at RK, what's think of it？
RK3399 support XHCI controller, but it's integrated in DWC3 IP core,
and we don't need to add xhci node separately, but just add dwc3
node like this:
usbdrd3_0: usb at fe800000 {
compatible = "rockchip,rk3399-dwc3";
......
ranges;
status = "disabled";
usbdrd_dwc3_0: dwc3 at fe800000 {
compatible = "snps,dwc3";
reg = <0x0 0xfe800000 0x0 0x100000>;
interrupts = <GIC_SPI 105 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
dr_mode = "otg";
......
};
};

And I'm working on DWC3 upstream.
RK3399 have two usb power domain (pd_perihp usb2 and pd_usb3),
usb driver isn't ready to handle power domain for the time being,
but we're trying to support usb power domain control.

Best regards,
William Wu
>
>>> Signed-off-by: Elaine Zhang <zhangqing at rock-chips.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Caesar Wang <wxt at rock-chips.com>
>>> Cc: linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
>>> Cc: linux-rockchip at lists.infradead.org
>>> Cc: Heiko Stuebner <heiko at sntech.de>
>>>
>>> ---
>>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi | 179
>>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> 1 file changed, 179 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi
>>> b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi
>>> index a6dd623..103e185 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi
>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi
>>> @@ -45,6 +45,7 @@
>>> #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/arm-gic.h>
>>> #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/irq.h>
>>> #include <dt-bindings/pinctrl/rockchip.h>
>>> +#include <dt-bindings/power/rk3399-power.h>
>>> #include <dt-bindings/thermal/thermal.h>
>>>
>>> / {
>>> @@ -594,6 +595,184 @@
>>> status = "disabled";
>>> };
>>>
>>> + qos_hdcp: qos_hdcp at ffa90000 {
>>> + compatible = "syscon";
>>> + reg = <0x0 0xffa90000 0x0 0x20>;
>>> + };
>>> +
>>> + qos_iep: qos_iep at ffa98000 {
>>> + compatible = "syscon";
>>> + reg = <0x0 0xffa98000 0x0 0x20>;
>>> + };
>>> +
>>> + qos_isp0_m0: qos_isp0_m0 at ffaa0000 {
>>> + compatible = "syscon";
>>> + reg = <0x0 0xffaa0000 0x0 0x20>;
>>> + };
>>> +
>>> + qos_isp0_m1: qos_isp0_m1 at ffaa0080 {
>>> + compatible = "syscon";
>>> + reg = <0x0 0xffaa0080 0x0 0x20>;
>>> + };
>>> +
>>> + qos_isp1_m0: qos_isp1_m0 at ffaa8000 {
>>> + compatible = "syscon";
>>> + reg = <0x0 0xffaa8000 0x0 0x20>;
>>> + };
>>> +
>>> + qos_isp1_m1: qos_isp1_m1 at ffaa8080 {
>>> + compatible = "syscon";
>>> + reg = <0x0 0xffaa8080 0x0 0x20>;
>>> + };
>>> +
>>> + qos_rga_r: qos_rga_r at ffab0000 {
>>> + compatible = "syscon";
>>> + reg = <0x0 0xffab0000 0x0 0x20>;
>>> + };
>>> +
>>> + qos_rga_w: qos_rga_w at ffab0080 {
>>> + compatible = "syscon";
>>> + reg = <0x0 0xffab0080 0x0 0x20>;
>>> + };
>>> +
>>> + qos_video_m0: qos_video_m0 at ffab8000 {
>>> + compatible = "syscon";
>>> + reg = <0x0 0xffab8000 0x0 0x20>;
>>> + };
>>> +
>>> + qos_video_m1_r: qos_video_m1_r at ffac0000 {
>>> + compatible = "syscon";
>>> + reg = <0x0 0xffac0000 0x0 0x20>;
>>> + };
>>> +
>>> + qos_video_m1_w: qos_video_m1_w at ffac0080 {
>>> + compatible = "syscon";
>>> + reg = <0x0 0xffac0080 0x0 0x20>;
>>> + };
>>> +
>>> + qos_vop_big_r: qos_vop_big_r at ffac8000 {
>>> + compatible = "syscon";
>>> + reg = <0x0 0xffac8000 0x0 0x20>;
>>> + };
>>> +
>>> + qos_vop_big_w: qos_vop_big_w at ffac8080 {
>>> + compatible = "syscon";
>>> + reg = <0x0 0xffac8080 0x0 0x20>;
>>> + };
>>> +
>>> + qos_vop_little: qos_vop_little at ffad0000 {
>>> + compatible = "syscon";
>>> + reg = <0x0 0xffad0000 0x0 0x20>;
>>> + };
>>> +
>>> + qos_gpu: qos_gpu at ffae0000 {
>>> + compatible = "syscon";
>>> + reg = <0x0 0xffae0000 0x0 0x20>;
>>> + };
>>> +
>>> + pmu: power-management at ff310000 {
>>> + compatible = "rockchip,rk3399-pmu", "syscon", "simple-mfd";
>>> + reg = <0x0 0xff310000 0x0 0x1000>;
>>> +
>>> + /*
>>> + * Note: RK3399 supports 6 voltage domains including VD_CORE_L,
>>> + * VD_CORE_B, VD_CENTER, VD_GPU, VD_LOGIC and VD_PMU.
>>> + * Some of the power domains are grouped together for every
>>> + * voltage domain.
>>> + * The detail contents as below.
>>> + */
>>> + power: power-controller {
>>> + status = "okay";
>>> + compatible = "rockchip,rk3399-power-controller";
>>> + #power-domain-cells = <1>;
>>> + #address-cells = <1>;
>>> + #size-cells = <0>;
>>> +
>>> + /* These power domains are grouped by VD_LOGIC */
>>> + pd_vio at RK3399_PD_VIO {
>>> + reg = <RK3399_PD_VIO>;
>>> + #address-cells = <1>;
>>> + #size-cells = <0>;
>>> +
>>> + pd_isp0 at RK3399_PD_ISP0 {
>>> + reg = <RK3399_PD_ISP0>;
>>> + clocks = <&cru ACLK_ISP0>,
>>> + <&cru HCLK_ISP0>;
>>> + pm_qos = <&qos_isp0_m0>,
>>> + <&qos_isp0_m1>;
>>> + };
>>> + pd_isp1 at RK3399_PD_ISP1 {
>>> + reg = <RK3399_PD_ISP1>;
>>> + clocks = <&cru ACLK_ISP1>,
>>> + <&cru HCLK_ISP1>;
>>> + pm_qos = <&qos_isp1_m0>,
>>> + <&qos_isp1_m1>;
>>> + };
>>> + pd_vo at RK3399_PD_VO {
>>> + reg = <RK3399_PD_VO>;
>>> + #address-cells = <1>;
>>> + #size-cells = <0>;
>>> +
>>> + pd_vopb at RK3399_PD_VOPB {
>>> + reg = <RK3399_PD_VOPB>;
>>> + clocks = <&cru ACLK_VOP0>,
>>> + <&cru HCLK_VOP0>;
>>> + pm_qos = <&qos_vop_big_r>,
>>> + <&qos_vop_big_w>;
>>> + };
>>> + pd_vopl at RK3399_PD_VOP {
>>> + reg = <RK3399_PD_VOPL>;
>>> + clocks = <&cru ACLK_VOP1>,
>>> + <&cru HCLK_VOP1>;
>>> + pm_qos = <&qos_vop_little>;
>>> + };
>>> + };
>>> + pd_hdcp at RK3399_PD_HDCP {
>>> + reg = <RK3399_PD_HDCP>;
>>> + clocks = <&cru ACLK_HDCP>,
>>> + <&cru HCLK_HDCP>,
>>> + <&cru PCLK_HDCP>;
>>> + pm_qos = <&qos_hdcp>;
>>> + };
>> HDCP sorts earlier than ISP0, so should be above that. Basically:
>> anything in the same area should be sorted alphabetically.
>
> The sort is follow up the TRM. At least I'm according to every voltage
> domain.
>
>>
>>> + };
>>> +
>>> + /* These power domains are grouped by VD_CENTER */
>>> + pd_vcodec at RK3399_PD_VCODEC {
>>> + reg = <RK3399_PD_VCODEC>;
>>> + clocks = <&cru ACLK_VCODEC>,
>>> + <&cru HCLK_VCODEC>;
>>> + pm_qos = <&qos_video_m0>;
>>> + };
>>> + pd_vdu at RK3399_PD_VDU {
>>> + reg = <RK3399_PD_VDU>;
>>> + clocks = <&cru ACLK_VDU>,
>>> + <&cru HCLK_VDU>;
>>> + pm_qos = <&qos_video_m1_r>,
>>> + <&qos_video_m1_w>;
>>> + };
>>> + pd_rga at RK3399_PD_RGA {
>>> + reg = <RK3399_PD_RGA>;
>>> + clocks = <&cru ACLK_RGA>,
>>> + <&cru HCLK_RGA>;
>>> + pm_qos = <&qos_rga_r>,
>>> + <&qos_rga_w>;
>>> + };
>>> + pd_iep at RK3399_PD_IE {
>>> + reg = <RK3399_PD_IEP>;
>>> + clocks = <&cru ACLK_IEP>,
>>> + <&cru HCLK_IEP>;
>>> + pm_qos = <&qos_iep>;
>>> + };
>> IE sorts before RGA. ...and both come before VCODEC / VDU.
>
> Ditto
>>
>>> +
>>> + /* These power domains are grouped by VD_GPU */
>>> + pd_gpu at RK3399_PD_GPU {
>>> + reg = <RK3399_PD_GPU>;
>>> + clocks = <&cru ACLK_GPU>;
>>> + pm_qos = <&qos_gpu>;
>>> + };
>>> + };
>>> + };
>>> +
>>> pmugrf: syscon at ff320000 {
>>> compatible = "rockchip,rk3399-pmugrf", "syscon", "simple-mfd";
>>> reg = <0x0 0xff320000 0x0 0x1000>;
>>> -- 
>>> 1.9.1
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Linux-rockchip mailing list
>> Linux-rockchip at lists.infradead.org
>> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip
>
>