[PATCH 1/3] extcon: Add documentation for EXTCON_CHG_USB_* and EXTCON_USB_*
Chanwoo Choi
cw00.choi at samsung.com
Tue Dec 20 23:20:32 PST 2016
Hi,
On 2016년 12월 21일 15:10, Baolin Wang wrote:
> Current there is both "EXTCON_USB" and "EXTCON_CHG_USB_SDP" which
> both seem to suggest a standard downstream port. But there is no
> documentation describing how these relate.
>
> Thus add documentation to describe EXTCON_CHG_USB_SDP should always
> appear together with EXTCON_USB, and EXTCON_CHG_USB_ACA would normally
> appear with EXTCON_USB_HOST.
>
> Signed-off-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang at linaro.org>
> ---
> include/linux/extcon.h | 9 ++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/extcon.h b/include/linux/extcon.h
> index b871c0c..6498b05 100644
> --- a/include/linux/extcon.h
> +++ b/include/linux/extcon.h
> @@ -46,7 +46,14 @@
> #define EXTCON_USB 1
> #define EXTCON_USB_HOST 2
>
> -/* Charging external connector */
> +/*
> + * Charging external connector
> + *
> + * When one SDP charger connector was reported, we should also report
> + * the USB connector, which means EXTCON_CHG_USB_SDP should always
> + * appear together with EXTCON_USB. The same as ACA charger connector,
> + * EXTCON_CHG_USB_ACA should always appear with EXTCON_USB_HOST.
> + */
Looks good to me.
But, you use the different word for ACA as following:
I think that 'would normally' is proper in descritpion.
- commit msg : EXTCON_CHG_USB_ACA would normally appear with EXTCON_USB_HOST.
- description: EXTCON_CHG_USB_ACA should always appear with EXTCON_USB_HOST.
> #define EXTCON_CHG_USB_SDP 5 /* Standard Downstream Port */
> #define EXTCON_CHG_USB_DCP 6 /* Dedicated Charging Port */
> #define EXTCON_CHG_USB_CDP 7 /* Charging Downstream Port */
>
--
Regards,
Chanwoo Choi
More information about the Linux-rockchip
mailing list