[PATCH v2 4/9] i2c: rcar: switch to i2c generic dt parsing

[Andy Shevchenko]

On Tue, 2015-12-08 at 10:37 +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> From: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas at sang-engineering.com>
> 
> Switch to the new generic functions. Plain convert, no functionality
> added yet.

One style nitpick.

> 
> Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas at sang-engineering.com>
> ---
>  drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-rcar.c | 16 +++++++++-------
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-rcar.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-
> rcar.c
> index d4322a9096786f..c663f4389bf898 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-rcar.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-rcar.c
> @@ -162,12 +162,15 @@ static int rcar_i2c_bus_barrier(struct
> rcar_i2c_priv *priv)
>  	return -EBUSY;
>  }
>  
> -static int rcar_i2c_clock_calculate(struct rcar_i2c_priv *priv, u32
> bus_speed)
> +static int rcar_i2c_clock_calculate(struct rcar_i2c_priv *priv,
> struct i2c_timings *t)
>  {
>  	u32 scgd, cdf, round, ick, scl, cdf_width;
>  	unsigned long rate;
>  	struct device *dev = rcar_i2c_priv_to_dev(priv);
>  
> +	/* Fall back to previously used values if not supplied */
> +	t->bus_freq_hz = t->bus_freq_hz ?: 100000;

On one hand it seems enough space to put one more t->bus_freq_hz, on
the other why not

if (!t->bus_freq_hz)
  = 100000;

I think a bit better to maintain latter.

-- 
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko at linux.intel.com>
Intel Finland Oy