[PATCH v12 1/3] drm: rockchip: Add basic drm driver
Mark yao
mark.yao at rock-chips.com
Tue Nov 18 01:57:44 PST 2014
On 2014年11月18日 16:32, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 04:00:29PM +0800, Mark Yao wrote:
>> From: Mark yao <mark.yao at rock-chips.com>
>>
>> This patch adds the basic structure of a DRM Driver for Rockchip Socs.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Mark Yao <mark.yao at rock-chips.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Daniel Kurtz <djkurtz at chromium.org>
>> Acked-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel at ffwll.ch>
>> Reviewed-by: Rob Clark <robdclark at gmail.com>
>> ---
>> Changes in v2:
>> - use the component framework to defer main drm driver probe
>> until all VOP devices have been probed.
>> - use dma-mapping API with ARM_DMA_USE_IOMMU, create dma mapping by
>> master device and each vop device can shared the drm dma mapping.
>> - use drm_crtc_init_with_planes and drm_universal_plane_init.
>> - remove unnecessary middle layers.
>> - add cursor set, move funcs to rockchip drm crtc.
>> - use vop reset at first init
>> - reference framebuffer when used and unreference when swap out vop
>>
>> Changes in v3:
>> - change "crtc->fb" to "crtc->primary-fb"
>> Adviced by Daniel Vetter
>> - init cursor plane with universal api, remove unnecessary cursor set,move
>>
>> Changes in v4:
>> Adviced by David Herrmann
>> - remove drm_platform_*() usage, use register drm device directly.
> Minor fixup for that part below.
>
> [snip]
>
>> +static int rockchip_drm_bind(struct device *dev)
>> +{
>> + struct drm_device *drm;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + drm = drm_dev_alloc(&rockchip_drm_driver, dev);
>> + if (!drm)
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> + ret = drm_dev_set_unique(drm, "%s", dev_name(dev));
>> + if (ret)
>> + goto err_free;
> Please call rockchip_drm_load here directly and don't put it as the ->load
> function into the driver vtable. The point of the alloc/register split is
> that the driver can be completely set up _before_ we register anything.
> But for backwards compat and historical reasons ->load is called somewhere
> in the middle (so that you could access the minor nodes if needed, since
> some drivers do that).
>
> Cheers, Daniel
OK, got it.
More information about the Linux-rockchip
mailing list