[PATCH v2] ethernet: arc: Add support for Rockchip SoC layer device tree bindings
Heiko Stübner
heiko at sntech.de
Wed Aug 27 13:19:22 PDT 2014
Am Mittwoch, 27. August 2014, 22:11:29 schrieb Arnd Bergmann:
> On Wednesday 27 August 2014 06:55:27 Romain Perier wrote:
> > This patch defines a platform glue layer for Rockchip SoCs which
> > support arc-emac driver. It ensures that regulator for the rmii is on
> > before trying to connect to the ethernet controller. It applies right
> > speed and mode changes to the grf when ethernet settings change.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Romain Perier <romain.perier at gmail.com>
> > ---
> >
> > drivers/net/ethernet/arc/Kconfig | 15 +++
> > drivers/net/ethernet/arc/Makefile | 1 +
> > drivers/net/ethernet/arc/emac.h | 2 +
> > drivers/net/ethernet/arc/emac_main.c | 2 +
> > drivers/net/ethernet/arc/emac_rockchip.c | 224
> > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 5 files changed, 244 insertions(+)
> > create mode 100644 drivers/net/ethernet/arc/emac_rockchip.c
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/arc/Kconfig
> > b/drivers/net/ethernet/arc/Kconfig index 89e04fd..6d96a82 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/arc/Kconfig
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/arc/Kconfig
> > @@ -32,4 +32,19 @@ config ARC_EMAC
> >
> > non-standard on-chip ethernet device ARC EMAC 10/100 is used.
> > Say Y here if you have such a board. If unsure, say N.
> >
> > +config EMAC_ROCKCHIP
> > + tristate "Rockchip EMAC support"
> > + select ARC_EMAC_CORE
> > + depends on OF_IRQ
> > + depends on OF_NET
> > + depends on ARCH_ROCKCHIP
> > + depends on REGULATOR_ACT8865
> > + depends on SMSC_PHY
> > + depends on MFD_SYSCON
>
> You should generally not add 'depends on' for specific drivers out
> of a subsystems. Just list the build-time dependencies, like
>
> depends on OF_IRQ && OF_NET && PHYLIB && REGULATOR && MFD_SYSCON
in this case even MFD_SYSCON can go away, as the syscon functions provide
stubs for !MFD_SYSCON .
[...]
> > + rate = 50000000;
>
> Where does this number come from?
The RMII interface needs always a rate of 50MHz ... my questions would be why
the 50000000 are not in the clk_set_rate directly and need an extra var :-)
Heiko
More information about the Linux-rockchip
mailing list