[PATCH v2 0/6] riscv: Make IPI_MAX visible and use it consistently

[Thomas Gleixner]

On Thu, Sep 17 2026 at 21:38, Radu Rendec wrote:
> I now realize that patch 1 (which introduces the conflicting change)
> was picked up by Thomas via the irq/drivers tip branch, but patch 6 is
> strictly a media subsystem patch, so I guess normally it should be
> picked up by a different maintainer via a different tree.
>
> Thomas, are you willing to pick this up too? I'm thinking it could
> avoid some pain if irq/drivers gets merged into mainline first, before
> patch 6 makes it there through the media subsystem. Also, it's a pretty
> "innocent" patch, it just renames an enum value, and it's contained
> within that driver.

The media folks picked it up already.