[PATCH] soc: microchip: mpfs: Fix flash leak in mpfs_sys_controller_probe()
Krzysztof Kozlowski
krzk at kernel.org
Sat Nov 7 01:58:35 PST 2026
On 06/11/2026 04:44, Wentao Liang wrote:
> Hi Krzysztof, Conor,
>
> Thank you both for the detailed review.
>
> Sorry for the late reply, and for the mess it caused.
>
> This is a v2 of the earlier patch, but I sent it without the v2 prefix,
> without a changelog, and without referring back to Conor's review from
> 8 October:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20261008-47741881fb032091ea3d7f0c@squawk/
>
> You are also right that the patches were sent in bulk across unrelated
> subsystems, without being grouped into patchsets, without running checkpatch
> on them, and without documenting what was and was not tested. I am sorry for
> the extra work this has caused you.
>
> In particular, thank you for pointing me to the kernel documentation on
> subsystem identification, patchset organization and testing, and for the
> guidance on how this work should be submitted. This is an important lesson
> for me, and from now on I will go through all the remaining feedback
> manually, one by one, and reply in a timely manner.
>
> Going forward, I will also not send patches in large batches, so that I do
> not exceed my own capacity to respond.
If it sends patches like a bot, if it ignored feeedback like a bot 100
times and then finally if it responds like a bot, it is probably a bot.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duck_test
Best regards,
Krzysztof
More information about the linux-riscv
mailing list