[PATCH v2 6/9] mm/mmu_notifier: add MMU_NOTIFIER_RANGE_PERM_UPGRADE
Carlos López
clopez at suse.de
Thu Nov 5 08:50:03 PST 2026
Add a range flag marking an invalidation that only upgrades permissions,
with no PFN change and no revoked access. change_protection() sets it
for MM_CP_PERM_UPGRADE and for the userfaultfd resolves, which unprotect
a page and thus only restore access.
Now that change_protection() keeps writable entries writable on these
changes, no present entry loses access. Writable migration and
device-private entries are still made read-only, which does not affect
secondary MMUs. Migration entries are only installed after secondary
MMUs are invalidated, and device-private pages are migrated back, with
an invalidation, before the CPU can access them.
hugetlb_change_protection() never sets the flag, as hugetlb does not
restore the write bit and may unshare page tables.
A secondary MMU can use the flag to keep its mappings rather than zap
them. Consumers that ignore it are unaffected.
Signed-off-by: Carlos López <clopez at suse.de>
---
include/linux/mmu_notifier.h | 5 +++++
mm/hugetlb.c | 4 ++++
mm/mprotect.c | 5 +++--
3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/mmu_notifier.h b/include/linux/mmu_notifier.h
index a11a44eef521..112be28cdf6b 100644
--- a/include/linux/mmu_notifier.h
+++ b/include/linux/mmu_notifier.h
@@ -60,6 +60,11 @@ enum mmu_notifier_event {
};
#define MMU_NOTIFIER_RANGE_BLOCKABLE (1 << 0)
+/*
+ * Set on an invalidation that only expands permissions without
+ * revoking any existing access, nor freeing/moving the underlying page.
+ */
+#define MMU_NOTIFIER_RANGE_PERM_UPGRADE (1 << 1)
struct mmu_notifier_ops {
/*
diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
index da5d04edf7c1..1a69d1da527e 100644
--- a/mm/hugetlb.c
+++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
@@ -6606,6 +6606,10 @@ long hugetlb_change_protection(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
* In the case of shared PMDs, the area to flush could be beyond
* start/end. Set range.start/range.end to cover the maximum possible
* range if PMD sharing is possible.
+ *
+ * MMU_NOTIFIER_RANGE_PERM_UPGRADE is never set here. hugetlb does not
+ * restore the write bit, and huge_pmd_unshare() may drop the mapping,
+ * so this is not a strict permission upgrade.
*/
mmu_notifier_range_init(&range, MMU_NOTIFY_PROTECTION_VMA,
0, mm, start, end);
diff --git a/mm/mprotect.c b/mm/mprotect.c
index 16b8aef755ab..fb2023dc6e66 100644
--- a/mm/mprotect.c
+++ b/mm/mprotect.c
@@ -601,8 +601,9 @@ static inline long change_pud_range(struct mmu_gather *tlb,
continue;
if (!range.start) {
- mmu_notifier_range_init(&range,
- MMU_NOTIFY_PROTECTION_VMA, 0,
+ mmu_notifier_range_init(&range, MMU_NOTIFY_PROTECTION_VMA,
+ mm_cp_is_perm_upgrade(cp_flags) ?
+ MMU_NOTIFIER_RANGE_PERM_UPGRADE : 0,
vma->vm_mm, addr, end);
mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start(&range);
}
--
2.51.0
More information about the linux-riscv
mailing list