[PATCH v2 1/1] spi: use dmaengine_desc_set_callback()
Andy Shevchenko
andriy.shevchenko at linux.intel.com
Thu Nov 5 01:04:34 PST 2026
On Wed, Nov 04, 2026 at 11:54:56PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 04/11/2026 21:41, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> >>
> >> But sure, if we want to play such numbers game, I will be sending
> >> reviews for single lines.
> >
> > I'm not playing anything. The problem is that the patch unites the files that
> > have distinct maintainers and unrelated to each other code. That's why in the
> > subsystems I maintain, I almost always require to split on per-driver basis.
> > Yes, exceptions are possible, but has to be quite rare.
>
> That's independent problem. Patch could be split, but it was not. Since
> it was not, receiving end should act accordingly, e.g. when performing
> incomplete review of only part of the patch, do not call that entire
> patch was reviewed by giving the Rb tag, but give Ack tag.
No, (partial) Rb != Ack.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
More information about the linux-riscv
mailing list