[RESEND v22 0/3] Add OpenCores PTC PWM support

[ukleinek at kernel.org]

Hello,

On Mon, Nov 02, 2026 at 02:11:46AM +0000, Hal Feng wrote:
> > On 26.11.2 06:17, patchwork-bot+linux-riscv wrote:
> > This series was applied to riscv/linux.git (fixes) by Conor Dooley
> > <conor.dooley at microchip.com>:
> > 
> > On Mon, 10 Aug 2026 11:07:11 +0800 you wrote:
> > > Add OpenCores PTC PWM driver which is used in StarFive
> > > JH7100/JH7110/JHB100 SoC.
> > >
> > > I will maintain this pwm module in place of William.
> > >
> > > Changes since v21:
> > > - Allow non-zero duty cycles shorter than one clock tick to round down to
> > >   zero.
> > > - Drop the .free() callback to preserve the PWM hardware state after
> > >   pwm_put().
> > > - Update the comment.
> > >
> > > [...]
> > 
> > Here is the summary with links:
> >   - [RESEND,v22,1/3] dt-bindings: pwm: opencores: Update compatibles,
> > examples and maintainers
> >     (no matching commit)
> >   - [RESEND,v22,2/3] riscv: dts: starfive: Correct pwm nodes
> >     https://git.kernel.org/riscv/c/2186ec5f59c2
> >   - [RESEND,v22,3/3] pwm: Add OpenCores PTC PWM driver
> >     (no matching commit)
> > 
> > You are awesome, thank you!
> > --
> > Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
> > https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
> 
> Has this patch series been applied? I've sent out the updated v23 patch series, but
> Krzysztof pointed out the Tested-by tag should not be added in the dt-bindings patch.
> Should I send a v24 to drop the Tested-by tag tag, or should I make the changes on top
> of v22 if it has already been applied?

The way I read it, only patch 2/3 "riscv: dts: starfive: Correct pwm
nodes" was applied.

Best regards
Uwe
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-riscv/attachments/20261102/d138564d/attachment.sig>