[GIT PULL] ~RISC-V~Starfive devicetrees fixes for v7.0-rc6

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 27/03/2026 10:49, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 27/03/2026 10:45, Conor Dooley wrote:
>>
>>> The commit touches only DTS, not DTSO, so how can you claim that a DTS
>>> file change breaks some completely other board (Raspberry)?
>>>
>>> This DTS file is nowhere included (and should not be).
>>>
>>> Of course maybe the true question would be why anyone described a hat as
>>> DTS file...
>>>
>>>>
>>>> E. we know that by chance you have found a base board that ignores the 
>>>> standard.
>>>>
>>>> Your patch 4cce8b2503ab5 made my standard compliant baseboard unusable. 
>>>
>>> DTS of some board is a final product, so it cannot be applied to a
>>> baseboard, that's pretty messed DTS tree...
>>
>> The cm-lite is a rpi compute module compatible device, the base boards
>> don't have any devices on them in a lot of cases and just provide
>> physical connectors, so there's no point having a distinct dts for every
>> baseboard of that type.
>> https://www.waveshare.com/product/cm4-io-base-a.htm
>>
> I saw the picture and it looked like it should never be a DTS, because
> it is not usable on its own. You cannot run it.


... although what I found earlier was different. I typed the model name
from DTS "Milk-V Mars CM Lite" and it gave me this:

https://milkv.io/mars-cm
which misses the "Lite" suffix.

What you pasted is called "Mini Base Board (A) Designed for Raspberry Pi
Compute Module 4" and it also does not have "Lite" in the name and
picture does not have the SoM.

I am confused now and I do not know what the DTS "Milk-V Mars CM Lite"
is. Answering to this is crucial, because it determines whether this
particular deviec has broken-cd or not.

Arguments that something else has broken-cd, thus you add such property
to "Milk-V Mars CM Lite" are obviously wrong.




Best regards,
Krzysztof