[PATCH v4 2/2] RISC-V: KVM: selftests: Fix firmware counter read in sbi_pmu_test

Jiakai Xu xujiakai2025 at iscas.ac.cn
Wed Mar 11 18:19:31 PDT 2026


The current sbi_pmu_test attempts to read firmware counters without
configuring them first with SBI_EXT_PMU_COUNTER_CFG_MATCH.

Previously this did not fail because KVM incorrectly allowed the read
and accessed fw_event[] with an out-of-bounds index when the counter
was unconfigured. After fixing that bug, the read now correctly returns
SBI_ERR_INVALID_PARAM, causing the selftest to fail.

Update the test to configure a firmware event before reading the
counter. Also add a negative test to ensure that attempting to read an
unconfigured firmware counter fails gracefully.

Signed-off-by: Jiakai Xu <xujiakai2025 at iscas.ac.cn>
Signed-off-by: Jiakai Xu <jiakaiPeanut at gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <andrew.jones at oss.qualcomm.com>
---
V2 -> V3:
- Removed unnecessary BIT(ret.value) & counter_mask_available check.
- Asserted ret.value == i after successful CFG_MATCH.
- Fixed eidx construction in SBI_EXT_PMU_COUNTER_CFG_MATCH.
---
 .../testing/selftests/kvm/include/riscv/sbi.h | 37 +++++++++++++++++++
 .../selftests/kvm/riscv/sbi_pmu_test.c        | 20 +++++++++-
 2 files changed, 56 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/riscv/sbi.h b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/riscv/sbi.h
index 046b432ae896..16f1815ac48f 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/riscv/sbi.h
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/riscv/sbi.h
@@ -97,6 +97,43 @@ enum sbi_pmu_hw_generic_events_t {
 	SBI_PMU_HW_GENERAL_MAX,
 };
 
+enum sbi_pmu_fw_generic_events_t {
+	SBI_PMU_FW_MISALIGNED_LOAD	= 0,
+	SBI_PMU_FW_MISALIGNED_STORE	= 1,
+	SBI_PMU_FW_ACCESS_LOAD		= 2,
+	SBI_PMU_FW_ACCESS_STORE		= 3,
+	SBI_PMU_FW_ILLEGAL_INSN		= 4,
+	SBI_PMU_FW_SET_TIMER		= 5,
+	SBI_PMU_FW_IPI_SENT		= 6,
+	SBI_PMU_FW_IPI_RCVD		= 7,
+	SBI_PMU_FW_FENCE_I_SENT		= 8,
+	SBI_PMU_FW_FENCE_I_RCVD		= 9,
+	SBI_PMU_FW_SFENCE_VMA_SENT	= 10,
+	SBI_PMU_FW_SFENCE_VMA_RCVD	= 11,
+	SBI_PMU_FW_SFENCE_VMA_ASID_SENT	= 12,
+	SBI_PMU_FW_SFENCE_VMA_ASID_RCVD	= 13,
+
+	SBI_PMU_FW_HFENCE_GVMA_SENT	= 14,
+	SBI_PMU_FW_HFENCE_GVMA_RCVD	= 15,
+	SBI_PMU_FW_HFENCE_GVMA_VMID_SENT = 16,
+	SBI_PMU_FW_HFENCE_GVMA_VMID_RCVD = 17,
+
+	SBI_PMU_FW_HFENCE_VVMA_SENT	= 18,
+	SBI_PMU_FW_HFENCE_VVMA_RCVD	= 19,
+	SBI_PMU_FW_HFENCE_VVMA_ASID_SENT = 20,
+	SBI_PMU_FW_HFENCE_VVMA_ASID_RCVD = 21,
+	SBI_PMU_FW_MAX,
+};
+
+/* SBI PMU event types */
+enum sbi_pmu_event_type {
+	SBI_PMU_EVENT_TYPE_HW = 0x0,
+	SBI_PMU_EVENT_TYPE_CACHE = 0x1,
+	SBI_PMU_EVENT_TYPE_RAW = 0x2,
+	SBI_PMU_EVENT_TYPE_RAW_V2 = 0x3,
+	SBI_PMU_EVENT_TYPE_FW = 0xf,
+};
+
 /* SBI PMU counter types */
 enum sbi_pmu_ctr_type {
 	SBI_PMU_CTR_TYPE_HW = 0x0,
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/riscv/sbi_pmu_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/riscv/sbi_pmu_test.c
index 924a335d2262..9404577e4ad5 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/riscv/sbi_pmu_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/riscv/sbi_pmu_test.c
@@ -436,6 +436,7 @@ static void test_pmu_basic_sanity(void)
 	struct sbiret ret;
 	int num_counters = 0, i;
 	union sbi_pmu_ctr_info ctrinfo;
+	unsigned long fw_eidx;
 
 	probe = guest_sbi_probe_extension(SBI_EXT_PMU, &out_val);
 	GUEST_ASSERT(probe && out_val == 1);
@@ -461,7 +462,24 @@ static void test_pmu_basic_sanity(void)
 			pmu_csr_read_num(ctrinfo.csr);
 			GUEST_ASSERT(illegal_handler_invoked);
 		} else if (ctrinfo.type == SBI_PMU_CTR_TYPE_FW) {
-			read_fw_counter(i, ctrinfo);
+			/* Read without configure should fail */
+			ret = sbi_ecall(SBI_EXT_PMU, SBI_EXT_PMU_COUNTER_FW_READ,
+					i, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0);
+			GUEST_ASSERT(ret.error == SBI_ERR_INVALID_PARAM);
+
+			/*
+			 * Try to configure with a common firmware event.
+			 * If configuration succeeds, verify we can read it.
+			 */
+			fw_eidx = ((unsigned long)SBI_PMU_EVENT_TYPE_FW << 16) |
+					  SBI_PMU_FW_ACCESS_LOAD;
+
+			ret = sbi_ecall(SBI_EXT_PMU, SBI_EXT_PMU_COUNTER_CFG_MATCH,
+					i, 1, 0, fw_eidx, 0, 0);
+			if (ret.error == 0) {
+				GUEST_ASSERT(ret.value == i);
+				read_fw_counter(i, ctrinfo);
+			}
 		}
 	}
 
-- 
2.34.1




More information about the linux-riscv mailing list