[PATCH net-next v3 1/3] dt-bindings: ethernet: eswin: add clock sampling control

[Conor Dooley]

On Tue, Mar 03, 2026 at 05:23:18PM -0800, Bo Gan wrote:
> Hi All,
> 
> On 3/3/26 16:47, Conor Dooley wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 03, 2026 at 04:38:46PM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > > On Tue,  3 Mar 2026 14:16:37 +0800 lizhi2 at eswincomputing.com wrote:
> > > > There are currently no in-tree users of the EIC7700 Ethernet driver, so
> > > > these changes are safe.
> > > 
> > > What do you mean by this sentence? The commit under Fixes was part of
> > > Linux v6.19 already.
> > 
> > The "funny" thing is that caring about users doesn't even really matter
> > on the devicetree patch, except for this hunk:
> > |@@ -81,7 +99,9 @@ properties:
> > |                          or external clock selection
> > |           - description: Offset of AXI clock controller Low-Power request
> > |                          register
> > |+          - description: Offset of register controlling TXD delay
> > |           - description: Offset of register controlling TX/RX clock delay
> > |+          - description: Offset of register controlling RXD delay
> > |
> > | required:
> > |   - compatible
> > And it only matters here because an item is injected mid-list. If this
> > was moved to the end with the RXD delay, the **dt-binding** changes
> > don't have issues with safety. I've not looked at whether there are
> > knock-on concerns about users in the driver or whatever yet, but from a
> > binding POV only that hunk can break something that currently works.
> 
> This was already discussed here in v1:
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/e7183ae1-8b8b-4e77-9f4e-3bc1b4b63556@lunn.ch/
> 
> The device-tree is not checked in yet by ESWIN folks, so there's currently
> no user of the dt-binding. No need to worry about backward compat.

The binding and driver exist, there doesn't need to be a dts in tree for
there to be potential users. If the break was important I might not
care, but this seems to be a gratuitous break, since the new items could
be added to the end of the list and compatibility maintained without
incurring any more difficulty for you.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 228 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-riscv/attachments/20260304/44c3dd31/attachment.sig>