[PATCH v3 1/2] riscv: Introduce support for hardware break/watchpoints

[Conor Dooley]

On Wed, Feb 25, 2026 at 10:33:27AM +0530, Himanshu Chauhan wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 24, 2026 at 1:33 PM Conor Dooley <conor.dooley at microchip.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 24, 2026 at 09:30:24AM +0530, Himanshu Chauhan wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On Mon, Feb 23, 2026 at 3:55 PM Conor Dooley <conor.dooley at microchip.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Feb 23, 2026 at 10:19:17AM +0530, Himanshu Chauhan wrote:

> >
> > Did you miss the comment at the end about the remaining TODOs?
> 
> No. As I mentioned in the cover letter, the ptrace support is not
> implemented here. I am actively working on it and these are
> implemented in ptrace work.
> The test is done using the perf events directly. The second patch in
> this patch set has the test application.

Then the patchset should still be marked RFC, since it is not finished.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 228 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-riscv/attachments/20260225/cd89bb96/attachment.sig>