[PATCH v10 0/3] riscv: canaan: Add support for K230 clock

[Xukai Wang]

On 2026/2/14 14:33, Jiayu Du wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 14, 2026 at 12:37:24AM +0800, Xukai Wang wrote:
>> On 2026/2/5 00:15, Jiayu Du wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jan 16, 2026 at 09:26:18PM +0800, Xukai Wang wrote:
>>>> This patch series adds clock controller support for the Canaan Kendryte
>>>> K230 SoC. The K230 SoC includes an external 24MHz OSC, 4 internal
>>>> PLLs and an external pulse input, with the controller managing these
>>>> sources and their derived clocks.
>>>  
>>> Hi, Xukai. Currently, the k230 initial series and the patch 3 of the
>>> pinctrl series has been in the linux next. So if possible, you need
>>> to rebase your clock series onto the latest linux-next.
>>>
>>> Then I will proceed with the development based on your v11 of the
>>> clock series.
>> I've rebased my patch series to `linux-next` (20260212). I noticed that
>> the patch which updated the `k230.dtsi` format has been merged into
>> `linux-next`.
>>
>> Consequently, I've updated the `prerequisite-patch-id` for my series
>> from `deda3c472f0000ffd40cddd7cf6d3b5e2d7da7dc` [1] to
>> `9a2d01f55574b538dad572e193f81c44661f0853` [2]. Is this change correct?
> Junhui Liu's commit `8cfdbd5e207d434a6e924eb81092874177f97536: riscv: dts:
> canaan: k230: Add b ISA extension`, also modified k230.dtsi. I'm not
> sure if you noticed this.
>
So, should I use `8cfdbd5e207d434a6e924eb81092874177f97536` as the
`prerequisite-patch-id` instead of
`9a2d01f55574b538dad572e193f81c44661f0853`?
>> Link:
>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-clk/tencent_F76EB8D731C521C18D5D7C4F8229DAA58E08@qq.com/
>> [1]
>> Link:
>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-devicetree/20251227092355.42825-1-jiayu.riscv@isrc.iscas.ac.cn/
>> [2]
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> linux-riscv mailing list
>> linux-riscv at lists.infradead.org
>> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv