[PATCH] riscv: kdump: return early for invalid 'crashkernel=0' input
Austin Kim
austindh.kim at gmail.com
Thu Feb 12 17:16:22 PST 2026
Hello Paul,
2026년 2월 13일 (금) AM 9:47, Paul Walmsley <pjw at kernel.org>님이 작성:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, 6 Feb 2026, Austin Kim wrote:
>
> > From: Austin Kim <austin.kim at lge.com>
> >
> > An invalid 'crashkernel=0' can be specified when running kdump.
> > By adding a check for 'crashkernel=0', it can return early when detecting
> > this invalid input.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Austin Kim <austin.kim at lge.com>
> > ---
> > arch/riscv/mm/init.c | 3 ++-
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/riscv/mm/init.c b/arch/riscv/mm/init.c
> > index 811e03786..e61fec445 100644
> > --- a/arch/riscv/mm/init.c
> > +++ b/arch/riscv/mm/init.c
> > @@ -1409,7 +1409,8 @@ static void __init arch_reserve_crashkernel(void)
> > ret = parse_crashkernel(boot_command_line, memblock_phys_mem_size(),
> > &crash_size, &crash_base,
> > &low_size, NULL, &high);
> > - if (ret)
> > + /* invalid value specified or 'crashkernel=0' */
> > + if (ret || !crash_size)
> > return;
> >
> > reserve_crashkernel_generic(crash_size, crash_base, low_size, high);
>
> Should this fix the common code in kernel/crash_reserve.c to return an
> error code when crashkernel=0 so it benefits other architectures?
Thanks for another better idea.
I will find out the way to add exception handling for the "crashkernel=0" case
in the generic APIs below.
kernel/crash_reserve.c
static int __init __parse_crashkernel(...)
static __init char *get_last_crashkernel(...)
As you said, it would be better if other architectures will benefit
from this change.
BR,
Austin Kim
>
>
> - Paul
More information about the linux-riscv
mailing list