[PATCHv6 06/17] LoongArch/mm: Align vmemmap to maximal folio size
David Hildenbrand (Arm)
david at kernel.org
Thu Feb 5 05:52:27 PST 2026
On 2/5/26 14:43, Kiryl Shutsemau wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 05, 2026 at 01:56:36PM +0100, David Hildenbrand (Arm) wrote:
>> On 2/4/26 17:56, David Hildenbrand (arm) wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Same comment, the "MAX_FOLIO_NR_PAGES * sizeof(struct page)" is just
>>> black magic here
>>> and the description of the situation is wrong.
>>>
>>> Maybe you want to pull the magic "MAX_FOLIO_NR_PAGES * sizeof(struct
>>> page)" into the core and call it
>>>
>>> #define MAX_FOLIO_VMEMMAP_ALIGN (MAX_FOLIO_NR_PAGES * sizeof(struct
>>> page))
>>>
>>> But then special case it base on (a) HVO being configured in an (b) HVO
>>> being possible
>>>
>>> #ifdef HUGETLB_PAGE_OPTIMIZE_VMEMMAP && is_power_of_2(sizeof(struct page)
>>> /* A very helpful comment explaining the situation. */
>>> #define MAX_FOLIO_VMEMMAP_ALIGN (MAX_FOLIO_NR_PAGES * sizeof(struct
>>> page))
>>> #else
>>> #define MAX_FOLIO_VMEMMAP_ALIGN 0
>>> #endif
>>>
>>> Something like that.
>>>
>>
>> Thinking about this ...
>>
>> the vmemmap start is always struct-page-aligned. Otherwise we'd be in
>> trouble already.
>>
>> Isn't it then sufficient to just align the start to MAX_FOLIO_NR_PAGES?
>>
>> Let's assume sizeof(struct page) == 64 and MAX_FOLIO_NR_PAGES = 512 for
>> simplicity.
>>
>> vmemmap start would be multiples of 512 (0x0010000000).
>>
>> 512, 1024, 1536, 2048 ...
>>
>> Assume we have an 256-pages folio at 1536+256 = 0x111000000
>
> s/0x/0b/, but okay.
:)
>
>> Assume we have the last page of that folio (0x011111111111), we would just
>> get to the start of that folio by AND-ing with ~(256-1).
>>
>> Which case am I ignoring?
>
> IIUC, you are ignoring the actual size of struct page. It is not 1 byte :P
I thought it wouldn't matter but, yeah, that's it.
"Align the vmemmap to the maximum folio metadata size" it is.
Then you can explain the situation also alongside
MAX_FOLIO_VMEMMAP_ALIGN, and that we expect this to be a power of 2.
--
Cheers,
David
More information about the linux-riscv
mailing list