[PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: mmc: Add sdhci support for Canaan k230
Conor Dooley
conor at kernel.org
Wed Feb 4 10:10:25 PST 2026
On Wed, Feb 04, 2026 at 04:29:06PM +0800, Jiayu Du wrote:
> The Canaan k230 uses the SDHCI from Synopsys. Add compatible strings
> to the k230. The k230 has two controllers. MMC0 supports eMMC, while
> MMC1 supports SDIO.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jiayu Du <jiayu.riscv at isrc.iscas.ac.cn>
> ---
> .../bindings/mmc/snps,dwcmshc-sdhci.yaml | 22 +++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/snps,dwcmshc-sdhci.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/snps,dwcmshc-sdhci.yaml
> index 7e7c55dc2440..cab33da3af7d 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/snps,dwcmshc-sdhci.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/snps,dwcmshc-sdhci.yaml
> @@ -23,6 +23,8 @@ properties:
> - const: sophgo,sg2044-dwcmshc
> - const: sophgo,sg2042-dwcmshc
> - enum:
> + - canaan,k230-emmc
> + - canaan,k230-sdio
I don't understand why there are two compatibles here, when the driver
is able to handle them both identically, using the common properties for
mmc controllers to differentiate. Is which is emmc and which sdio
actually just determined by how the k230 boards use them?
Or, if there are pinout differences, would pinctrl allow each to be used
for either?
> - rockchip,rk3568-dwcmshc
> - rockchip,rk3588-dwcmshc
> - snps,dwcmshc-sdhci
> @@ -87,6 +89,26 @@ required:
> allOf:
> - $ref: mmc-controller.yaml#
>
> + - if:
> + properties:
> + compatible:
> + contains:
> + enum:
> + - canaan,k230-emmc
> + - canaan,k230-sdio
> + then:
> + properties:
> + clocks:
> + minItems: 2
> + maxItems: 5
> + clock-names:
> + items:
> + - const: core
> + - const: bus
> + - const: axi
> + - const: block
> + - const: timer
> +
> - if:
> properties:
> compatible:
> --
> 2.52.0
>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 228 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-riscv/attachments/20260204/5c2f0501/attachment.sig>
More information about the linux-riscv
mailing list