[PATCH v2 2/3] dt-bindings: interrupt-controller: add UltraRISC DP1000 PLIC

Conor Dooley conor at kernel.org
Mon Oct 13 11:25:54 PDT 2025


On Mon, Oct 13, 2025 at 12:15:37PM +0100, Lucas Zampieri wrote:
> From: Charles Mirabile <cmirabil at redhat.com>
> 
> Add a new compatible string for UltraRISC DP1000 PLIC.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Charles Mirabile <cmirabil at redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Lucas Zampieri <lzampier at redhat.com>
> ---
>  .../bindings/interrupt-controller/sifive,plic-1.0.0.yaml        | 3 +++
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/sifive,plic-1.0.0.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/sifive,plic-1.0.0.yaml
> index 5b827bc24301..a419de50f5a8 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/sifive,plic-1.0.0.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/sifive,plic-1.0.0.yaml
> @@ -74,6 +74,8 @@ properties:
>                - sophgo,sg2044-plic
>                - thead,th1520-plic
>            - const: thead,c900-plic
> +      - items:
> +          - const: ultrarisc,dp1000-plic
> +          - const: ultrarisc,cp100-plic

Based on your cover letter, this is problem not incorrect, but this fails
the eye test and looks wrong. Please mention in your commit message that
dp1000 is an soc and cp100 is a purchasable IP core.

pw-bot: changes-requested

>        - items:
>            - const: sifive,plic-1.0.0
>            - const: riscv,plic0
> --
> 2.51.0
> 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 228 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-riscv/attachments/20251013/d4aa718c/attachment.sig>


More information about the linux-riscv mailing list