[PATCH 1/3] riscv: use TASK_TI_CPU instead of TASK_TI_CPU_NUM

[Alexandre Ghiti]

Hi Radim,

On 7/22/25 18:05, Radim Krčmář wrote:
> The offsets of TASK_TI_CPU and TASK_TI_CPU_NUM are identical, and
> TASK_TI_CPU is a better name for thread_info.cpu.
>
> Signed-off-by: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar at ventanamicro.com>
> ---
>   arch/riscv/include/asm/asm.h    | 2 +-
>   arch/riscv/kernel/asm-offsets.c | 1 -
>   2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/asm.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/asm.h
> index a8a2af6dfe9d..b3022bc224ec 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/asm.h
> +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/asm.h
> @@ -91,7 +91,7 @@
>   #endif
>   
>   .macro asm_per_cpu dst sym tmp
> -	REG_L \tmp, TASK_TI_CPU_NUM(tp)
> +	REG_L \tmp, TASK_TI_CPU(tp)
>   	slli  \tmp, \tmp, PER_CPU_OFFSET_SHIFT
>   	la    \dst, __per_cpu_offset
>   	add   \dst, \dst, \tmp
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/asm-offsets.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/asm-offsets.c
> index 6e8c0d6feae9..49cf2c347485 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/asm-offsets.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/asm-offsets.c
> @@ -49,7 +49,6 @@ void asm_offsets(void)
>   	OFFSET(TASK_TI_A2, task_struct, thread_info.a2);
>   #endif
>   
> -	OFFSET(TASK_TI_CPU_NUM, task_struct, thread_info.cpu);
>   	OFFSET(TASK_THREAD_F0,  task_struct, thread.fstate.f[0]);
>   	OFFSET(TASK_THREAD_F1,  task_struct, thread.fstate.f[1]);
>   	OFFSET(TASK_THREAD_F2,  task_struct, thread.fstate.f[2]);


Reviewed-by: Alexandre Ghiti <alexghiti at rivosinc.com>

Thanks,

Alex