[RFC PATCH 1/3] efi-rtc: Remove wakeup functionality

[Ard Biesheuvel]

On Mon, 14 Jul 2025 at 16:22, Demi Marie Obenour <demiobenour at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 7/14/25 02:19, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> > On Mon, 14 Jul 2025 at 16:13, Demi Marie Obenour <demiobenour at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 7/14/25 02:08, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> >>> From: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb at kernel.org>
> >>>
> >>> The EFI rtc driver is used by non-x86 architectures only, and exposes
> >>> the get/set wakeup time functionality provided by the underlying
> >>> platform. This is usually broken on most platforms, and not widely used
> >>> to begin with [if at all], so let's just remove it.
> >> systemd uses the underlying functionality: a timer can wake the system up.
> >> I have no idea if that is implemented in terms of this function, though.
> >
> > To be clear, you are referring to wake from poweroff at some date/time
> > in the future, right?
>
> Yes.
>
> > This change does not remove this functionality from the RTC subsystem,
> > it just ceases to expose it on non-x86 EFI platforms that claim to
> > support it.
>
> Do these platforms generally expose the functionality in a different way?

On x86, the CMOS rtc is manipulated directly (and this is officially
condoned by the EFI spec).

On non-x86, this functionality rarely works, which is really the point
of this series.

> If not, systemd should probably document that the functionality is
> non-portable if it doesn't do that already.

Not sure what you mean by non-portable. This functionality should be
exposed in a generic manner (using the RTC subsystem interfaces), but
only if it can be relied upon. On x86, the RTC subsystem will use the
rtc-cmos driver, which implements the wakeup routines in terms of port
I/O.

If removing this functionality altogether from the EFI rtc driver is a
problem, perhaps it would be better to implement an allowlist based
solution that does not attempt to access the runtime services by
default.