[PATCH 0/8] add Voyager board support

[Ben Zong-You Xie]

On Fri, Jul 04, 2025 at 11:15:43AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > Also, there is a patch dependency in this patchset:
> > Patch 2 <- Patch 4 <- Patch 5 <- Patch 6
> 
> How? These are bindings. How DTS can depend on the binding? Do you have
> akcs from their subsystem maintainers that you are sending it here?
>
> Sorry, but no, this should go via their maintainers, unless they did not
> want to pick it up. Is this the case here?

The dependency chain arises because each of these patches introduces a new file,
requiring a corresponding update to the MAINTAINERS file.

In v4 [1], Rob and Daniel attempted to merge Patch 4 and Patch 5, respectively,
but encountered conflicts in the MAINTAINERS file. That's why I specified the
patch dependencies in v5 and this patchset.

Now, I understand that binding patches are typically handled by subsystem
maintainers. To prevent the conflicts again, I think I should gather all
MAINTAINERS file changes into a single patch. Is that right?

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250514095350.3765716-1-ben717@andestech.com/

Thanks,
Ben