[PATCH] riscv: bpf: Fix uninitialized symbol 'retval_off'

[Pu Lehui]

On 2025/8/20 14:25, Chenghao Duan wrote:
> In __arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(), retval_off is only meaningful when
> save_ret is true, so the current logic is correct. However, in the

lgtm, and same for `ip_off`, pls patch it together.

> original logic, retval_off is only initialized under certain
> conditions, which may cause a build warning.
> 
> So initialize retval_off unconditionally to fix it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chenghao Duan <duanchenghao at kylinos.cn>
> ---
>   arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c | 5 ++---
>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c b/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
> index 10e01ff06312..49bbda8372b0 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
> @@ -1079,10 +1079,9 @@ static int __arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(struct bpf_tramp_image *im,
>   	stack_size += 16;
>   
>   	save_ret = flags & (BPF_TRAMP_F_CALL_ORIG | BPF_TRAMP_F_RET_FENTRY_RET);
> -	if (save_ret) {
> +	if (save_ret)
>   		stack_size += 16; /* Save both A5 (BPF R0) and A0 */
> -		retval_off = stack_size;
> -	}
> +	retval_off = stack_size;
>   
>   	stack_size += nr_arg_slots * 8;
>   	args_off = stack_size;