[PATCH v3 06/20] riscv: add ISA extension parsing for vector crypto

[Jerry Shih]

On Nov 9, 2023, at 15:54, Conor Dooley <conor.dooley at microchip.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 09, 2023 at 07:44:46AM +0000, Conor Dooley wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 09, 2023 at 10:58:41AM +0800, Jerry Shih wrote:
>>> On Nov 7, 2023, at 18:55, Clément Léger <cleger at rivosinc.com> wrote:
>>> The Zvknha and Zvknhb are exclusive. It's not the superset relationship.
>>> 
>>> Please check:
>>> https://github.com/riscv/riscv-crypto/issues/364#issuecomment-1726782096
>> 
>> You got a response to this on the previous version, but didn't engage
>> with it:
>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/c64d9ddb-edbd-4c8f-b56f-1b90d82100b7@rivosinc.com/#t

Reply for the thread:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/c64d9ddb-edbd-4c8f-b56f-1b90d82100b7@rivosinc.com/#t

> Yes, but for instance, what happens if the user query the zvknha (if it
> only needs SHA256) but zvknhb is present. If we don't declare zvknha,
> then it will fail but the support would actually be present due to
> zvknhb being there.

If we needs SHA256 only, then we should check whether we have zvknha `or` zvknhb.
https://github.com/openssl/openssl/blob/4d4657cb6ba364dfa60681948b0a30c40bee31ca/crypto/sha/sha_riscv.c#L24

> Ahh, I now see what that happened. Your mailer is broken and puts the
> message-id of what you are replying to in the In-Reply-To and Reply-To
> headers. The former is correct, the latter is bogus & means you don't even
> get delivered the response.

I use mac builtin `mail` client. And I think I put the `in-reply-to` address to
the `reply to` field. Hope this one works well. Thank you for the thread forwarding.

-Jerry