[PATCH v2 5/7] selftests/nolibc: use INT_MAX instead of __INT_MAX__
Zhangjin Wu
falcon at tinylab.org
Mon May 29 06:04:02 PDT 2023
nolibc now has INT_MAX in stdint.h, so, don't mix INT_MAX and
__INT_MAX__, unify them to INT_MAX.
Signed-off-by: Zhangjin Wu <falcon at tinylab.org>
---
tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c
index e75ce6b68565..9ff9d87cc78e 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c
@@ -935,7 +935,7 @@ static const struct test test_names[] = {
int main(int argc, char **argv, char **envp)
{
int min = 0;
- int max = __INT_MAX__;
+ int max = INT_MAX;
int ret = 0;
int err;
int idx;
@@ -983,7 +983,7 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv, char **envp)
* here, which defaults to the full range.
*/
do {
- min = 0; max = __INT_MAX__;
+ min = 0; max = INT_MAX;
value = colon;
if (value && *value) {
colon = strchr(value, ':');
--
2.25.1
More information about the linux-riscv
mailing list