[PATCH 0/2] tools/nolibc: riscv: Fix up compile error for rv32
Thomas Weißschuh
thomas at t-8ch.de
Sat May 20 00:18:25 PDT 2023
On 2023-05-19 12:19:10+0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 12:11:00PM +0200, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> > Hi Willy,
> >
> > On 2023-05-19 11:40:30+0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> > > Hi Zhangjin,
> > >
> > > On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 01:00:18AM +0800, Zhangjin Wu wrote:
> > > > Hi, Willy
> > > >
> > > > nolibc for riscv is only tested for rv64 currently (see
> > > > tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/Makefile), this patchset tries to let it
> > > > compile for rv32, but still not pass the nolibc selftest:
> > > >
> > > > * The first patch uses lw/sw instead of ld/sd for rv32 and verse-vice for rv64
> > > > * This patch may conflict with the stackprotector patch [1], because
> > > > both of them changed the _start assembly in arch-riscv.h
> > >
> > > That's quite embarrassing, I'm having to trace of that series here. Now
> > > I can find it in my LKML archives, but I don't have the direct message and
> > > didn't spot the other ones. I'll have to investigate, thanks for notifying
> > > me! I'm CCing Thomas, I will check with him how to best merge the two.
> >
> > I think the conflict should be trivial to fix.
> >
> > I can also resend my series or just the single riscv patch.
>
> OK then I'll pick Zhangjin's series and will apply yours on top of it.
> Do not bother resending the whole series, only the riscv patch will be
> sufficient, I have the rest of your series in my lkml mbox.
Could you let me know if or when your are publishing your integration
branch?
Thomas
More information about the linux-riscv
mailing list