[PATCH v1] dt-bindings: riscv: deprecate riscv,isa

[Conor Dooley]

On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 12:31:51PM +0200, Andrew Jones wrote:
> > +  # Additional Standard Extensions, sorted by category then alphabetically
> 
> Can we just do pure alphabetically? And the single-letter extensions above
> don't have a "sorted by" comment above them. I guess they need one, or
> maybe they can also be alphabetical?

Maybe it is just me, but my brain is too used to seeing those ones in
something approaching canonical order. I'd rather keep them that way &
then alphanumerical for everything else?

I also noticed that the CMO stuff wasn't actually in the comment's order
anyway, so needs a re-sort to begin with. A vote in favour of
alphanumerical.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 228 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-riscv/attachments/20230518/d33beeaf/attachment.sig>